Things people do who are too stupid to live:
Believe Donald Trump.
Swim with sharks.
Cross heavy traffic against the light.
Vote for Donald Trump.
Carry a loaded rifle in a crowd.
Turn peaceful protests into riots.
Go maskless in a crowd.
Think Donald Trump is a good president.
Believe humans have never been in space.
Get high on wood alcohol to see what it's like.
Think Donald Trump is a good man.
Get news from the Internet.
Handle poisonous snakes.
Look down the barrel of a gun to see if it's loaded.
Prop an electric fan on an unstable shelf above their bathtub.
Think Donald Trump is a good father.
Sneak up on a mule from the back.
Eat fugu on a bet.
Drive a car into water.
Believe Fox News.
Trust Donald Trump.
Play Russian roulette.
Believe dinosaurs and humans coexisted.
Believe every conspiracy theory they hear.
Rewire an electrical switch with the current on.
Flirt with their boss's wife in his office.
Jump off a roof into a pool.
Think Donald Trump is a good ___________.
--- Diogenes, 8/31/2020
U.S. Constitution
The foundation of the United States of America
31 August 2020
29 August 2020
We Shall Overcome
"Today is the 57th anniversary of a terrific event and a beautiful speech made by a great man."
That's what DJTrump didn't say about the Commitment "Get Your Knee Off Our Necks" March on Friday. In fact he said nothing.
On August 28, 1963, some 250,000 people gathered on the National Mall in what was called The March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. I'm sure a great many people remember where they were that Wednesday.
Although the march was a protest action the spirit of the day was one of celebration, brotherhood, and aspiration. Speakers included a bevy of Christian and Jewish clergy and most of the leaders of major civil rights organizations.
The stream of speakers was punctuated with music by the likes of Marian Anderson, Joan Baez, Bob Dylan, and Mahalia Jackson. It was at this gathering that "We Shall Overcome" became the civil rights anthem it remains.
And it was where The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr told us about his dream. The "I Have a Dream" speech was inspired. Partially improvised, it speaks of visions Dr. King had for an integrated and free future. It was one of the great addresses of the 20th century, and Dr. King is still held up as one of the century's greatest orators.
Yesterday's rally had much of the same spirit, now carried by a generation new to civil strife, but no less energized to meet it. Dr. King's son, Martin Luther King III spoke. He is an effective speaker, and reinforced the battle cry of the march: "There’s a knee upon the neck of democracy and our nation can only live so long without the oxygen of freedom. . . . The simple challenge before us is that everyone can cast a ballot and everyone who can must cast a ballot."¹
But it was clear that Dr. King's mantle of Chief Orator of the new civil rights movement has fallen squarely on The Rev. Al Sharpton. He has a commanding voice and the intensity and classical cadence of generations of preachers before him: "We need Mitch McConnell and the U.S. Senate to meet on the George Floyd Policing and Justice Act or we’re going to meet you Senators at the polls November 3rd. Whether we’ve got to mail in, walk in, ride in, crawl in, we want our bill passed." And, "It’s time we have a conversation with America. We need to have a conversation about your racism, about your bigotry, about your hate, about how you would put your knee on our neck while we cry out for our lives. We need a new conversation. . . .You act like it’s no trouble to shoot us in the back. You act like it’s no trouble to put a chokehold on us while we scream, 'I can’t breathe' 11 times. You act like it’s no trouble to hold a man down on the ground until you squeeze the life out of him. It’s time for a new conversation."²
His is the voice that will gain followers and grab the attention of the disinterested and disenfranchised. He will need to use it wisely to speak truth to all things Trump and to raise the spirit of revolution in the American people.
Our voices will rise again, and We Shall Overcome.
--- Diogenes, 8/29/2020
¹ https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/2020-march-on-washington-event-transcript (Begins about 26 minutes in)
² https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/al-sharpton-speech-transcript-2020-march-on-washington
* Videos of the event are available on YouTube, MSNBC, and CBS, among others.
That's what DJTrump didn't say about the Commitment "Get Your Knee Off Our Necks" March on Friday. In fact he said nothing.
On August 28, 1963, some 250,000 people gathered on the National Mall in what was called The March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. I'm sure a great many people remember where they were that Wednesday.
Although the march was a protest action the spirit of the day was one of celebration, brotherhood, and aspiration. Speakers included a bevy of Christian and Jewish clergy and most of the leaders of major civil rights organizations.
The stream of speakers was punctuated with music by the likes of Marian Anderson, Joan Baez, Bob Dylan, and Mahalia Jackson. It was at this gathering that "We Shall Overcome" became the civil rights anthem it remains.
And it was where The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr told us about his dream. The "I Have a Dream" speech was inspired. Partially improvised, it speaks of visions Dr. King had for an integrated and free future. It was one of the great addresses of the 20th century, and Dr. King is still held up as one of the century's greatest orators.
Yesterday's rally had much of the same spirit, now carried by a generation new to civil strife, but no less energized to meet it. Dr. King's son, Martin Luther King III spoke. He is an effective speaker, and reinforced the battle cry of the march: "There’s a knee upon the neck of democracy and our nation can only live so long without the oxygen of freedom. . . . The simple challenge before us is that everyone can cast a ballot and everyone who can must cast a ballot."¹
But it was clear that Dr. King's mantle of Chief Orator of the new civil rights movement has fallen squarely on The Rev. Al Sharpton. He has a commanding voice and the intensity and classical cadence of generations of preachers before him: "We need Mitch McConnell and the U.S. Senate to meet on the George Floyd Policing and Justice Act or we’re going to meet you Senators at the polls November 3rd. Whether we’ve got to mail in, walk in, ride in, crawl in, we want our bill passed." And, "It’s time we have a conversation with America. We need to have a conversation about your racism, about your bigotry, about your hate, about how you would put your knee on our neck while we cry out for our lives. We need a new conversation. . . .You act like it’s no trouble to shoot us in the back. You act like it’s no trouble to put a chokehold on us while we scream, 'I can’t breathe' 11 times. You act like it’s no trouble to hold a man down on the ground until you squeeze the life out of him. It’s time for a new conversation."²
His is the voice that will gain followers and grab the attention of the disinterested and disenfranchised. He will need to use it wisely to speak truth to all things Trump and to raise the spirit of revolution in the American people.
Our voices will rise again, and We Shall Overcome.
--- Diogenes, 8/29/2020
¹ https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/2020-march-on-washington-event-transcript (Begins about 26 minutes in)
² https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/al-sharpton-speech-transcript-2020-march-on-washington
* Videos of the event are available on YouTube, MSNBC, and CBS, among others.
27 August 2020
Will We Never Learn?
Police have killed 766 Americans this year.*
Two hundred fifty-five of those deaths--almost exactly one-third--have happened since George Floyd was murdered by police in Minneapolis.
And now Kenosha. Last Sunday, Rusten Sheskey, a seven-year veteran of the Kenosha police force, shot unarmed 29-year-old Jacob Blake seven times in the back.
Seven times. In the back.
Blake is alive for now, paralyzed from the waist down and with severe internal injuries. He was shot as he was attempting to get into his car. Shesky fired at very close range. Putting seven rounds into a suspect you're actually holding by his shirt is beyond excessive. It speaks of intent to kill.
If anyone thought, in this season of plague and politics, that Kenosha would remain quiet after the needless shooting of a Black man at the hands of police officers, they've been living on a different planet.
Violence begets violence. Senseless violence begets anger and more senseless violence. Of course protests were going to happen, and of course they would turn violent. America is angry.
The target of our anger is, oxymoronically, a vacuum: the vacuum of leadership in Washington that should have offered assistance, supported victims and helped to find a peaceful way to resolve the situation. Instead, the fearmongering, hate-spewing, tyrannical Psycho-in-Chief, knowing nothing of leadership or conflict resolution, blames everyone in reach and makes inflammatory threats to send in troops, which heightens the tension, leading to more violence, and on and on . . .
We will fight back.
I happen to believe that the majority of American police forces are staffed by women and men who take seriously the charge "To protect and defend." But the profession also draws rogues who are attracted by the notion of having control over citizens, and sadists like Derek Chauvin, who killed George Floyd.
One such is 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse, a police and/or militia wannabe who showed up with some other rifle-toting terrorists on the third night of protests. At some point, possibly because he had fallen and feared attack, he fired randomly into the crowd, killing two people and injuring one. He was arrested and is being held in Antioch, Illinois. He faces first-degree murder charges.
And he is celebrated. Fools-of-a-Kind Aubrey Huff and Tucker Carlson actually praised Rittenhouse, a terrorist whom on-site videos show to be a cold-blooded killer.
Will we never learn?
--- Diogenes, 8/27/2020
Please share widely
* The Washington Post, "Fatal Force," https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/investigations/police-shootings-database/
Two hundred fifty-five of those deaths--almost exactly one-third--have happened since George Floyd was murdered by police in Minneapolis.
And now Kenosha. Last Sunday, Rusten Sheskey, a seven-year veteran of the Kenosha police force, shot unarmed 29-year-old Jacob Blake seven times in the back.
Seven times. In the back.
Blake is alive for now, paralyzed from the waist down and with severe internal injuries. He was shot as he was attempting to get into his car. Shesky fired at very close range. Putting seven rounds into a suspect you're actually holding by his shirt is beyond excessive. It speaks of intent to kill.
If anyone thought, in this season of plague and politics, that Kenosha would remain quiet after the needless shooting of a Black man at the hands of police officers, they've been living on a different planet.
Violence begets violence. Senseless violence begets anger and more senseless violence. Of course protests were going to happen, and of course they would turn violent. America is angry.
The target of our anger is, oxymoronically, a vacuum: the vacuum of leadership in Washington that should have offered assistance, supported victims and helped to find a peaceful way to resolve the situation. Instead, the fearmongering, hate-spewing, tyrannical Psycho-in-Chief, knowing nothing of leadership or conflict resolution, blames everyone in reach and makes inflammatory threats to send in troops, which heightens the tension, leading to more violence, and on and on . . .
We will fight back.
I happen to believe that the majority of American police forces are staffed by women and men who take seriously the charge "To protect and defend." But the profession also draws rogues who are attracted by the notion of having control over citizens, and sadists like Derek Chauvin, who killed George Floyd.
One such is 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse, a police and/or militia wannabe who showed up with some other rifle-toting terrorists on the third night of protests. At some point, possibly because he had fallen and feared attack, he fired randomly into the crowd, killing two people and injuring one. He was arrested and is being held in Antioch, Illinois. He faces first-degree murder charges.
And he is celebrated. Fools-of-a-Kind Aubrey Huff and Tucker Carlson actually praised Rittenhouse, a terrorist whom on-site videos show to be a cold-blooded killer.
Will we never learn?
--- Diogenes, 8/27/2020
Please share widely
* The Washington Post, "Fatal Force," https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/investigations/police-shootings-database/
26 August 2020
A Brief Study in Gentility
The only thing within lightyears of being slightly positive about DJTrump's unpresidency is that it affirms what we were told as children: anybody can become president.
The first 44 American presidents had experience in military and/or public service.
Not only does #45 no have such experience, he has no idea what "service" means. He does get "public." It's the rabble that he governs. The American people, via the obsolete and archaic Electoral College, have put a buffoon who knows nothing about government in charge of it.
Robert Heinlein once quipped that "Vox populi vox dei" best translates as "My God! How did we get in this mess?" How very apt.
The Framers were Gentlemen, a term from British society designating a land-owning, low-ranking nobleman. In America it signified a man worthy of respect by reason of his honesty, good character, and integrity.
Signing the Declaration of Independence they swore, "we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor." In an age when honor was everything, prized even more highly than one's life, that was saying something.
We still use the term "gentleman," but it has become degraded. As wealth in the United States came to be prized more than ancestry, America's richest men began to fancy themselves the nation's gentry. They built mansions in cities and summer "cottages"--palaces to the rest of us--in places like Newport, Rhode Island, and Hyde Park, New York.
Then came the trustbusters, WWI, the Great Depression, and WWII. Wealth was redistributed, redefined, and reallocated. New species of moneyed classes appeared: Hollywood actors, professional athletes, "celebrities."
Few vestiges of gentility remain in this country, and certainly not in the White House. The Poser-in-Chief can put on the trappings of fancy dress and ceremony, but he's still obviously a schlub. He has bad posture, looks terrible in a tuxedo, and doesn't know how to shake hands. His social skills are nonexistent, and polite conversation is beyond him. Completing sentences in extemporaneous speech is a skill his expensive schools never taught him.
Facing an interviewer he leans forward, mouth agape, hands clasped between spread knees, far more resembling a horny adolescent watching a striptease than anything vaguely gentle or manly.
And this is the chief executive of these United States.
--- Diogenes, 8/26/2020
The first 44 American presidents had experience in military and/or public service.
Not only does #45 no have such experience, he has no idea what "service" means. He does get "public." It's the rabble that he governs. The American people, via the obsolete and archaic Electoral College, have put a buffoon who knows nothing about government in charge of it.
Robert Heinlein once quipped that "Vox populi vox dei" best translates as "My God! How did we get in this mess?" How very apt.
The Framers were Gentlemen, a term from British society designating a land-owning, low-ranking nobleman. In America it signified a man worthy of respect by reason of his honesty, good character, and integrity.
Signing the Declaration of Independence they swore, "we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor." In an age when honor was everything, prized even more highly than one's life, that was saying something.
We still use the term "gentleman," but it has become degraded. As wealth in the United States came to be prized more than ancestry, America's richest men began to fancy themselves the nation's gentry. They built mansions in cities and summer "cottages"--palaces to the rest of us--in places like Newport, Rhode Island, and Hyde Park, New York.
Then came the trustbusters, WWI, the Great Depression, and WWII. Wealth was redistributed, redefined, and reallocated. New species of moneyed classes appeared: Hollywood actors, professional athletes, "celebrities."
Few vestiges of gentility remain in this country, and certainly not in the White House. The Poser-in-Chief can put on the trappings of fancy dress and ceremony, but he's still obviously a schlub. He has bad posture, looks terrible in a tuxedo, and doesn't know how to shake hands. His social skills are nonexistent, and polite conversation is beyond him. Completing sentences in extemporaneous speech is a skill his expensive schools never taught him.
Facing an interviewer he leans forward, mouth agape, hands clasped between spread knees, far more resembling a horny adolescent watching a striptease than anything vaguely gentle or manly.
And this is the chief executive of these United States.
--- Diogenes, 8/26/2020
25 August 2020
Mr Mxyztplk
Here's what I've taken away from the Tumpalalooza so far:
I I I I I I I I--AM GREAT!! I AM THE GREATEST, NOT WHATSISNAME THE BOXER. MEHRR,T BIDENN JSOTHW OMD I HAVE NO SKY FALLING HSIWRHVUENWN APOCALYPSE WITH HARRIS NASTYU C B,,WITCH IS HE STILL ALIVE? NO NOT BIDEN, WHATHISNAME YOU KNOW THE COL--B-B-BLACK BOXER--ALLEY/ ALI, HE'S NOT--THEN I AM THE GREATEST! AND YOU KNOW WHO I AM.
HERE'S--WHATSYERNAME, SWEETIE? OH YEAH--K-K-KIMBERLY, ONE OF MY SON'S GIRLFRIENDS, (WINK, WINK) TO TALK ABOUT ME--WELL, OF COURSE ME, WHO ELSE.
HEY, EVERYBODY--WHERE ARE YA? I CAN'T SEE ANYBODY? WELL, ANYWAY, I JUST WANNA SAY WHAT A GREAT GUY DONALD IS. OH, YEAH, I KNOW HE'S THE PREZ, BUT HE LETS ME CALL HIM DONALD. ISN'T THAT JUST ADORABLE? AND HE'S A GREAT GUY, YA KNOW--I MEAN HE'S JUST GREAT, AND HE'S DONE A LOT OF STUFF AND HE'L KEEP DOIN MORE--SO GOODNIGHT.
BACK TO THE PREZ: YEAH, THAT'S RIGHT--I'VE DONE SO MUCH GOOD STUFF I CAN'T EVEN REMEMBER MOST OF IT BUT I KNOW IT WAS GOOD. DKMSDPKPF A LOT BET--BET--BETTER THAN OBAMA EVER DID, AND HJHDU SLEEPY JOE WON'T EVEN COME CLOSEKKDJBI I'M GOING TO M CJB BE PRESIDENT FOREVER. HUH?
SO NOW---KEEP REMEMBERING THAT I'M THE ONE WHO KEEPS YOU---FJEOM WHO KEEPS YOU SAFE AND WILL NOT LET UNDESIRABLES MOVE INTO YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD. HOLD THE DAMN TELEPROMTER F'KNIJO SDTILL! YES, I PERSONALLY WILL KEEP UNDESIRABLES--YOU KNOW WHO I MEAN, RIGHT? THEY'RE NOT WHITE. THEYVE GOT DE PLACES TO GO AND ITS NOT YOUR NEIGHBOR----HUH? CNN TURNED OFF? WELL, FUCK 'EM I AM THE GREATSOKMK M F AND FOX IS THERE. I KNOW--I BOUGHT 'EM ALLF JJNVNKJFP
Diogenes --- 8/25/2020
I I I I I I I I--AM GREAT!! I AM THE GREATEST, NOT WHATSISNAME THE BOXER. MEHRR,T BIDENN JSOTHW OMD I HAVE NO SKY FALLING HSIWRHVUENWN APOCALYPSE WITH HARRIS NASTYU C B,,WITCH IS HE STILL ALIVE? NO NOT BIDEN, WHATHISNAME YOU KNOW THE COL--B-B-BLACK BOXER--ALLEY/ ALI, HE'S NOT--THEN I AM THE GREATEST! AND YOU KNOW WHO I AM.
HERE'S--WHATSYERNAME, SWEETIE? OH YEAH--K-K-KIMBERLY, ONE OF MY SON'S GIRLFRIENDS, (WINK, WINK) TO TALK ABOUT ME--WELL, OF COURSE ME, WHO ELSE.
HEY, EVERYBODY--WHERE ARE YA? I CAN'T SEE ANYBODY? WELL, ANYWAY, I JUST WANNA SAY WHAT A GREAT GUY DONALD IS. OH, YEAH, I KNOW HE'S THE PREZ, BUT HE LETS ME CALL HIM DONALD. ISN'T THAT JUST ADORABLE? AND HE'S A GREAT GUY, YA KNOW--I MEAN HE'S JUST GREAT, AND HE'S DONE A LOT OF STUFF AND HE'L KEEP DOIN MORE--SO GOODNIGHT.
BACK TO THE PREZ: YEAH, THAT'S RIGHT--I'VE DONE SO MUCH GOOD STUFF I CAN'T EVEN REMEMBER MOST OF IT BUT I KNOW IT WAS GOOD. DKMSDPKPF A LOT BET--BET--BETTER THAN OBAMA EVER DID, AND HJHDU SLEEPY JOE WON'T EVEN COME CLOSEKKDJBI I'M GOING TO M CJB BE PRESIDENT FOREVER. HUH?
SO NOW---KEEP REMEMBERING THAT I'M THE ONE WHO KEEPS YOU---FJEOM WHO KEEPS YOU SAFE AND WILL NOT LET UNDESIRABLES MOVE INTO YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD. HOLD THE DAMN TELEPROMTER F'KNIJO SDTILL! YES, I PERSONALLY WILL KEEP UNDESIRABLES--YOU KNOW WHO I MEAN, RIGHT? THEY'RE NOT WHITE. THEYVE GOT DE PLACES TO GO AND ITS NOT YOUR NEIGHBOR----HUH? CNN TURNED OFF? WELL, FUCK 'EM I AM THE GREATSOKMK M F AND FOX IS THERE. I KNOW--I BOUGHT 'EM ALLF JJNVNKJFP
Diogenes --- 8/25/2020
23 August 2020
America v. Америка
There was a time when "America" was synonymous with strength, justice, freedom, opportunity, enlightenment, peace, cooperation, fairness, and understanding.
Other nations looked to us for leadership, for assistance, for intervention, for friendship, for alliances.
Now we are shunned by many other countries. We have become an outlier, indeed a pariah of the community of nations where we were once a major player.
Once when we spoke, nations listened; now they snicker.
This downfall of America's reputation has been brought about single-handedly by the ill-begotten president, Donald Trump. Tyrannis Trump has spent his term trying to change America into what he thinks it should be.
The unpresident's psychopathy dictates that the world has to be Trumpcentric. Whether he'll manage to make the world in his own image is doubtful, but he's been working hard to transform this nation into something he may have seen in a dream.
Trump's ultimate delusional goal is an America for Americans only, by which he means white English-speaking non-Catholic Christians. There is no place in his philosophy for people of any color or ethnicity, including the indigenous nations who were here long before Europeans arrived.
He was elected on a platform of racism, xenophobia, and paranoia. His only clearly stated plan was to build a wall to keep Mexicans out. By May 2020, only 3 miles out of 194 miles of wall constructed or replaced under the Trump administration was new fencing. The border is 1,954 miles long.
After almost 4 years of boasting about the wall and its progress the Bricklayer-in-Chief has only managed to add one-tenth of one percent to what already stood before he was elected. And everything that stands is only 10 percent of the length of the border.
He has steadily worked to isolate the United States from the rest of the world. He has used flimsy and nonsensical reasons to remove the U.S. from several organizations and agreements, including:
The Bumbler-in-Chief has never set out any coherent plan or policy, but the actions above reveal a sort of stream-of-consciousness approach to distancing the United States from the general community of nations.
Isolationism has never worked for the United States. Had Trump ever looked at the history of his own country, he might have come across Thomas Jefferson's 1801 inaugural address, in which he described his vision of American isolationism: "peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none…”¹
American presidents have never been able to avoid those entangling alliances. Whether coming to the defense of fellow republics or defending America's own interests, presidents and Congresses have become entangled, usually because it was the right thing to do.
That is a foreign concept to Trump. Everything he does is for his own personal gain and interest, and if anyone else can decipher what that is, they're not talking.
Isolationism is impossible when every citizen has access to worldwide communication. Citizens of the isolationist countries North Korea, China, Saudi Arabia, and Iran, among others, don't have this access.
Don't let the Isolator-in-Chief add the United States of America to that list.
--- Diogenes, 8/23/2020
Please share widely
¹ Robert Longley, "The Evolution of American Isolationism," https://www.thoughtco.com/the-evolution-of-american-isolationism-4123832
Other nations looked to us for leadership, for assistance, for intervention, for friendship, for alliances.
Now we are shunned by many other countries. We have become an outlier, indeed a pariah of the community of nations where we were once a major player.
Once when we spoke, nations listened; now they snicker.
This downfall of America's reputation has been brought about single-handedly by the ill-begotten president, Donald Trump. Tyrannis Trump has spent his term trying to change America into what he thinks it should be.
The unpresident's psychopathy dictates that the world has to be Trumpcentric. Whether he'll manage to make the world in his own image is doubtful, but he's been working hard to transform this nation into something he may have seen in a dream.
Trump's ultimate delusional goal is an America for Americans only, by which he means white English-speaking non-Catholic Christians. There is no place in his philosophy for people of any color or ethnicity, including the indigenous nations who were here long before Europeans arrived.
He was elected on a platform of racism, xenophobia, and paranoia. His only clearly stated plan was to build a wall to keep Mexicans out. By May 2020, only 3 miles out of 194 miles of wall constructed or replaced under the Trump administration was new fencing. The border is 1,954 miles long.
After almost 4 years of boasting about the wall and its progress the Bricklayer-in-Chief has only managed to add one-tenth of one percent to what already stood before he was elected. And everything that stands is only 10 percent of the length of the border.
He has steadily worked to isolate the United States from the rest of the world. He has used flimsy and nonsensical reasons to remove the U.S. from several organizations and agreements, including:
- The Paris Climate Agreement
- The Trans-Pacific Partnership trade bloc
- UNESCO, the UN's culture and education body
- The UN Human Rights Council, responsible for the promotion and protection of all human rights around the globe
- The UN Relief and Works Agency, which provides aid to Palestinian refugees in the Near East
- The Iran nuclear accord
- The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty required the U. S. and the Soviet Union to eliminate all nuclear and conventional ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles with ranges of 500 to 5,500 kilometers
- The Open Skies Treaty allows member nations to overfly other members' territory to collect data on military forces and activities
- and others, including a possible withdrawal from the World Health Organization; he has threatened to withdraw but not carried through
The Bumbler-in-Chief has never set out any coherent plan or policy, but the actions above reveal a sort of stream-of-consciousness approach to distancing the United States from the general community of nations.
Isolationism has never worked for the United States. Had Trump ever looked at the history of his own country, he might have come across Thomas Jefferson's 1801 inaugural address, in which he described his vision of American isolationism: "peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none…”¹
American presidents have never been able to avoid those entangling alliances. Whether coming to the defense of fellow republics or defending America's own interests, presidents and Congresses have become entangled, usually because it was the right thing to do.
That is a foreign concept to Trump. Everything he does is for his own personal gain and interest, and if anyone else can decipher what that is, they're not talking.
Isolationism is impossible when every citizen has access to worldwide communication. Citizens of the isolationist countries North Korea, China, Saudi Arabia, and Iran, among others, don't have this access.
Don't let the Isolator-in-Chief add the United States of America to that list.
--- Diogenes, 8/23/2020
Please share widely
¹ Robert Longley, "The Evolution of American Isolationism," https://www.thoughtco.com/the-evolution-of-american-isolationism-4123832
22 August 2020
Hope, Light, and Love
The Democratic National Convention has proved the ancient art of speechifying has evolved and is still lively.
Oratory has softened from bombastic to urbane and antagonism has given way to pointedness, but the barbs are sharper when delivered in the calm context of a virtual auditorium instead of in front of a raucous crowd.
The Biden/Harris campaign has settled on a message of love, hope, and light. Such words are uncommon in political campaigns, but I expect they were chosen because they are exactly opposite the Hater-in-Chief's message. As Joe Biden said toward the end of his acceptance speech, "love is more powerful than hate, hope is more powerful than fear, and light is more powerful than dark."¹
Don't take that to mean the Democrats are floating on a hazy platform of unicorns and rainbows. Before her nomination Kamala Harris may not have been a household word for many of us, but you can bet she's going to become one.
She is nothing if not straightforward: "Donald Trump’s failure of leadership has cost lives and livelihoods. If you’re a parent struggling with your child’s remote learning, or you’re a teacher struggling on the other side of that screen, you know what we’re doing right now is not working."²
And she's not shy about taking on the oligarchy: "I fought against transnational criminal organizations. I took on the biggest banks and helped take down one of the biggest for-profit colleges. I know a predator when I see one." That last sentence was a barely veiled reference to Trump.
Neither is Biden any cream puff. The man has stealth. He'll talk along for a while in an almost conversational style, then, without raising his voice, increase in startling intensity. Consider this:
"For our seniors, Social Security is a sacred obligation, a sacred promise made that they paid for. The current president is threatening to break that promise. He’s proposing to eliminate a tax that pays for almost half of Social Security, without any way of making up for that lost revenue, resulting in cuts. I will not let that happen." While you could hear the point coming, the last sentence was suddenly stated forcefully, with his finger pointing toward the camera and eyes drilling into it. I was transfixed.
And just a couple of more promises: "I’ll be a president who’ll stand with our allies and friends and make it clear to our adversaries, the days of cozying up to dictators is over. Under President Biden, America will not turn a blind eye to Russian bounties on their heads of American soldiers, nor will I put up with foreign interference in our most sacred democratic exercise, voting." And, "Character is on the ballot, compassion is on the ballot, decency, science, democracy, they’re all on the ballot. Who we are as a nation, what we stand for, and most importantly, who we want to be, that’s all on the ballot. And the choice could not be more clear. No rhetoric is needed. Just judge this president on the facts." This was followed by a long litany of the Loser-in-Chief's failures.
Throughout his address Biden enumerated several policies he intends to put into place, beginning with seriously addressing COVID-19, and including education reform, reinstatement of the Affordable Care Act, and economic restructuring: "it’s long past time the wealthiest people and the biggest corporations in this country paid their fair share."
From the Democratic side this looks to be a lively and well thought out campaign.
And what of the upcoming Trumpalalooza? As for the Bloviating Gasbag-in-Chief, Shakespeare had him. Everything he says “is a tale / Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, / Signifying nothing."³
And plans, or anything like a platform? "The plan is to frighten voters and appeal to any latent racist fears. Since Biden is not a radical, the claim is that he's not really in charge; he's a Trojan Horse. And Harris -- she may seem too tough, too nasty, but she's not tough enough. Got that?"⁴
Expect the same responses to questions--"We're going to take care of that;" "I'll look into that;" "We'll fix that;" "It's going to go away."
And the same string of lies, disinformation, nonsense, lies, horsefeathers, codswallop, lies, drivel, balderdash, flapdoodle, lies, and, ahem, lies.
Would it kill the Boondoggler-in-Chief to tell the truth just once? I'd like to find out.
--- Diogenes, 8/21/2020
Please share.
¹ Biden quotes are from the transcript of his acceptance speech, at https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/joe-biden-2020-dnc-speech-transcript
² Harris quotes are from the transcript of her acceptance speech, at https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/kamala-harris-2020-dnc-speech-transcript
³ William Shakespeare, "Macbeth," Act 5, scene 5.
Oratory has softened from bombastic to urbane and antagonism has given way to pointedness, but the barbs are sharper when delivered in the calm context of a virtual auditorium instead of in front of a raucous crowd.
The Biden/Harris campaign has settled on a message of love, hope, and light. Such words are uncommon in political campaigns, but I expect they were chosen because they are exactly opposite the Hater-in-Chief's message. As Joe Biden said toward the end of his acceptance speech, "love is more powerful than hate, hope is more powerful than fear, and light is more powerful than dark."¹
Don't take that to mean the Democrats are floating on a hazy platform of unicorns and rainbows. Before her nomination Kamala Harris may not have been a household word for many of us, but you can bet she's going to become one.
She is nothing if not straightforward: "Donald Trump’s failure of leadership has cost lives and livelihoods. If you’re a parent struggling with your child’s remote learning, or you’re a teacher struggling on the other side of that screen, you know what we’re doing right now is not working."²
And she's not shy about taking on the oligarchy: "I fought against transnational criminal organizations. I took on the biggest banks and helped take down one of the biggest for-profit colleges. I know a predator when I see one." That last sentence was a barely veiled reference to Trump.
Neither is Biden any cream puff. The man has stealth. He'll talk along for a while in an almost conversational style, then, without raising his voice, increase in startling intensity. Consider this:
"For our seniors, Social Security is a sacred obligation, a sacred promise made that they paid for. The current president is threatening to break that promise. He’s proposing to eliminate a tax that pays for almost half of Social Security, without any way of making up for that lost revenue, resulting in cuts. I will not let that happen." While you could hear the point coming, the last sentence was suddenly stated forcefully, with his finger pointing toward the camera and eyes drilling into it. I was transfixed.
And just a couple of more promises: "I’ll be a president who’ll stand with our allies and friends and make it clear to our adversaries, the days of cozying up to dictators is over. Under President Biden, America will not turn a blind eye to Russian bounties on their heads of American soldiers, nor will I put up with foreign interference in our most sacred democratic exercise, voting." And, "Character is on the ballot, compassion is on the ballot, decency, science, democracy, they’re all on the ballot. Who we are as a nation, what we stand for, and most importantly, who we want to be, that’s all on the ballot. And the choice could not be more clear. No rhetoric is needed. Just judge this president on the facts." This was followed by a long litany of the Loser-in-Chief's failures.
Throughout his address Biden enumerated several policies he intends to put into place, beginning with seriously addressing COVID-19, and including education reform, reinstatement of the Affordable Care Act, and economic restructuring: "it’s long past time the wealthiest people and the biggest corporations in this country paid their fair share."
From the Democratic side this looks to be a lively and well thought out campaign.
And what of the upcoming Trumpalalooza? As for the Bloviating Gasbag-in-Chief, Shakespeare had him. Everything he says “is a tale / Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, / Signifying nothing."³
And plans, or anything like a platform? "The plan is to frighten voters and appeal to any latent racist fears. Since Biden is not a radical, the claim is that he's not really in charge; he's a Trojan Horse. And Harris -- she may seem too tough, too nasty, but she's not tough enough. Got that?"⁴
Expect the same responses to questions--"We're going to take care of that;" "I'll look into that;" "We'll fix that;" "It's going to go away."
And the same string of lies, disinformation, nonsense, lies, horsefeathers, codswallop, lies, drivel, balderdash, flapdoodle, lies, and, ahem, lies.
Would it kill the Boondoggler-in-Chief to tell the truth just once? I'd like to find out.
--- Diogenes, 8/21/2020
Please share.
¹ Biden quotes are from the transcript of his acceptance speech, at https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/joe-biden-2020-dnc-speech-transcript
² Harris quotes are from the transcript of her acceptance speech, at https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/kamala-harris-2020-dnc-speech-transcript
³ William Shakespeare, "Macbeth," Act 5, scene 5.
⁴ CNN Opinion, "Kamala Harris throws Trump off balance," https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/13/opinions/kamala-harris-throws-trump-off-balance-ghitis/index.html
20 August 2020
Not In Our House!
"I Pray Heaven Bestow the Best of Blessings on This House and All that shall hereafter inhabit it. May none but Honest and Wise Men ever rule under this Roof."
So wrote President John Adams on November 2, 1800, in a letter to his wife after spending his first night in the White House. Perhaps to remind future presidents of the expectations placed on them, President Franklin D. Roosevelt had the passage inscribed in the fireplace of the State Dining Room.
Adams, Roosevelt, and all other deceased presidents are no doubt spinning in their graves because the current tenant is neither honest nor wise, nor does he deserve any blessings.
The White House is the oldest government building in Washington, D. C. It is also the most important because it's where we house our president. Yes, "we," not some faceless "they." The government is still of, by, and for us, and we ultimately own it; Blacks have a special claim to it because their ancestors provided the labor to build it.
The Blasphemer-in-Chief has now declared he will deliver his acceptance speech as the Republican presidential candidate from the White House. He is facing a good deal of resistance to this, including from within his party and senior staff. Typically he's giving it no attention. It doesn't matter, because his plan, however distasteful and galling, is legal.
By now you've probably heard a lot about the Hatch Act. I love its official title: "An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political Activities." The act is named for Senator Carl Hatch, a New Mexico Democrat, and was signed into law in August 1939. One wants to ask what Senator Hatch was thinking when he inserted the word "pernicious." Perhaps he had a vision of #45, the Pernicious President.
The gist of the Hatch Act is that it prohibits employees of the executive branch from engaging in partisan political activity while on duty or in the federal workplace. The problem is, it exempts the president and vice-president.
It seems to me that that exemption is a fatal flaw. I suppose back in the day it went without saying that people who had the goods to become president were upstanding individuals of wisdom and honesty. We should apologize to history and bow our heads in shame for having allowed such a putz as DJTrump into the White House.
When we finally get out of all this craziness I'm going to propose doing away with that exemption. No one is above the law, and the chief executive and his assistant should not be allowed to do something their employees can't.¹
Theoretically, if the president does engage in political activity on government property he would have to do it as a solo gig. If he involved on-duty employees in any capacity he would be causing them to break the law. Trump does this frequently, especially in press conferences and interviews when he regularly trash talks Biden and Harris. Any federal staff who assist in such activities are automatically in violation of the act. The same goes for travel on Air Force One to political events. And any executive branch employee, for instance a press secretary, who publicly speaks of partisan political matters is also in violation.
Penalties for violation are not terribly severe, but they're nothing to sneeze at: "The penalty structure for violations of the Hatch Act by federal employees includes removal from federal service, reduction in grade, debarment from federal employment for a period not to exceed 5 years, suspension, reprimand, or a civil penalty not to exceed $1,000."²
The elements of this structure that would hit employees hardest would be removal and/or debarment from federal service. I have said elsewhere that people who work for the government, particularly at the executive level, tend to be power junkies. Removing them from the federal workforce would be like uprooting a plant.
Does the Slavemaster-in-Chief care? No. Those employees are, to use an archaic term, cannon fodder. He is exempt from the act and that is all that matters to him. So in his employees we see yet another sector of the American public that Trump doesn't realize actually exists. They are lives that he can disrupt and molest without a thought as if they were no more than insects.
That is why we have to say to his plan to speak from the White House: Not In Our House!
--- Diogenes, 8/20/2020
Please share.
¹ Perhaps a compromise could be reached in which the president would have to ask permission from the House to hold such an event.
² U. S. Office of Special Counsel: https://osc.gov/Services/Pages/HatchAct-Federal.aspx#tabGroup51
So wrote President John Adams on November 2, 1800, in a letter to his wife after spending his first night in the White House. Perhaps to remind future presidents of the expectations placed on them, President Franklin D. Roosevelt had the passage inscribed in the fireplace of the State Dining Room.
Adams, Roosevelt, and all other deceased presidents are no doubt spinning in their graves because the current tenant is neither honest nor wise, nor does he deserve any blessings.
The White House is the oldest government building in Washington, D. C. It is also the most important because it's where we house our president. Yes, "we," not some faceless "they." The government is still of, by, and for us, and we ultimately own it; Blacks have a special claim to it because their ancestors provided the labor to build it.
The Blasphemer-in-Chief has now declared he will deliver his acceptance speech as the Republican presidential candidate from the White House. He is facing a good deal of resistance to this, including from within his party and senior staff. Typically he's giving it no attention. It doesn't matter, because his plan, however distasteful and galling, is legal.
By now you've probably heard a lot about the Hatch Act. I love its official title: "An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political Activities." The act is named for Senator Carl Hatch, a New Mexico Democrat, and was signed into law in August 1939. One wants to ask what Senator Hatch was thinking when he inserted the word "pernicious." Perhaps he had a vision of #45, the Pernicious President.
The gist of the Hatch Act is that it prohibits employees of the executive branch from engaging in partisan political activity while on duty or in the federal workplace. The problem is, it exempts the president and vice-president.
It seems to me that that exemption is a fatal flaw. I suppose back in the day it went without saying that people who had the goods to become president were upstanding individuals of wisdom and honesty. We should apologize to history and bow our heads in shame for having allowed such a putz as DJTrump into the White House.
When we finally get out of all this craziness I'm going to propose doing away with that exemption. No one is above the law, and the chief executive and his assistant should not be allowed to do something their employees can't.¹
Theoretically, if the president does engage in political activity on government property he would have to do it as a solo gig. If he involved on-duty employees in any capacity he would be causing them to break the law. Trump does this frequently, especially in press conferences and interviews when he regularly trash talks Biden and Harris. Any federal staff who assist in such activities are automatically in violation of the act. The same goes for travel on Air Force One to political events. And any executive branch employee, for instance a press secretary, who publicly speaks of partisan political matters is also in violation.
Penalties for violation are not terribly severe, but they're nothing to sneeze at: "The penalty structure for violations of the Hatch Act by federal employees includes removal from federal service, reduction in grade, debarment from federal employment for a period not to exceed 5 years, suspension, reprimand, or a civil penalty not to exceed $1,000."²
The elements of this structure that would hit employees hardest would be removal and/or debarment from federal service. I have said elsewhere that people who work for the government, particularly at the executive level, tend to be power junkies. Removing them from the federal workforce would be like uprooting a plant.
Does the Slavemaster-in-Chief care? No. Those employees are, to use an archaic term, cannon fodder. He is exempt from the act and that is all that matters to him. So in his employees we see yet another sector of the American public that Trump doesn't realize actually exists. They are lives that he can disrupt and molest without a thought as if they were no more than insects.
That is why we have to say to his plan to speak from the White House: Not In Our House!
--- Diogenes, 8/20/2020
Please share.
¹ Perhaps a compromise could be reached in which the president would have to ask permission from the House to hold such an event.
² U. S. Office of Special Counsel: https://osc.gov/Services/Pages/HatchAct-Federal.aspx#tabGroup51
16 August 2020
The Vote
As Americans, the most important thing we own is the right to vote. If we were ever to lose that right we would soon lose every other. The United States of America would be on the way to extinction.
Donald J. Trump is attempting to rob us of the vote.
The right to vote is central to our freedom, indeed to the very existence of our country. The popular election of a chief executive was such a new idea in the 18th century that the Framers spelled out its process at length in Article II, Section 1 (since amended) of the Constitution.
The Constitution itself has been amended no fewer than six times for the purpose of expanding suffrage: 15th Amendment, 1870, allowed voting regardless of race, color, previous condition of servitude; 17th, 1913, provided direct election of senators; 19th, 1920, allowed voting regardless of sex; 23rd, 1961, D.C. residents allowed to vote in presidential elections; 24th, 1964, banned poll taxes; and 26th, 1971, dropped voting age from 21 to 18. Additionally, many Congressional acts expanded the right to vote.
Maintaining a democracy takes work. Everyone has a part to play, and our part as voters is the most important. We decide the shape and makeup of the government.
Our elected officials do the heavy lifting, but we elect them and can remove them from office when we think they're not doing the job we elected them to do.
It all works as long as everyone plays by the rules. It worked until 2016, when the voting public suffered a psychotic break and elected¹ as president a freakish person who has no use for rules and has no history whatsoever of public service.
That person, the unpresident, Donald John Trump, believes he owns everything he controls, and he believes he controls the office of president of the United States of America. He will stop at nothing, and I mean nothing, to remain in that office.
That's why he wants to steal the vote from all of us.
Although he and his family regularly use them, Trump has long criticized mail-in ballots as a source of voting fraud. There is no truth to those claims.
Mail-in ballots are used by people who can't get to their polling place on Election Day. It's also called an absentee ballot because it was first used by Civil War soldiers far from their homes. It's still widely used by members of the armed forces and many others: disabled and/or homebound persons, business travelers, hospitalized people, people with second homes, and the Hypocrite-in-Chief and his family.
Since the beginning of this year it's been anticipated that a greater number of Americans than usual will use it to avoid exposure to COVID-19. That scares the Jackass-in-Chief because he knows a lot of those people won't vote for him, and he can't control or manipulate that part of the vote.
So he's decided to disable the U. S. Postal Service. It's like using a shotgun to kill a fly, but overkill has always been the Trump way.
He is attempting, through his puppet Postmaster General Louis Dejoy, to gut the Postal Service, making it impossible for it to get ballots to people who want them and for mail-in voters to get their ballots to their election officers by the deadline. He has removed sorting machines and other equipment and technology central to mail delivery from post offices and other stations, taken away curbside mailboxes, and will no doubt begin closing post offices wholesale if he isn't stopped.
Dejoy is a toady who essentially bought his position with a $2 million donation to the Trump campaign, and now he's doing his master's bidding: Doing his best to slow down, if not stop, mail delivery, and lying through his teeth about the state of the Postal Service.
Ten states now have universal mail-in voting: California, Colorado, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Jersey, Oregon, Utah, Vermont, and Washington. Need I say that nine of them are "blue" states? Denying the vote to those states alone will disenfranchise approximately 29 million Americans.
Then there are the approximately 650,000 military personnel whom Trump claims to value who won't be able to vote.
The most bizarre thing about this is that Trump seems not to understand that he's disenfranchising members of both parties. He doesn't care. when he has an idea in his diseased mind he pursues it relentlessly.
Congress might be able to do something about the situation, but they're treating it all as business as usual, and have all gone home for their summer break. That, I say, is unconscionable. The economy is in a mess, people have no money, our most important right is at peril, and they're on vacation.
I don't know about you, but that's not what I voted for them to do.
And every day they're out of their offices the Idiot Child-in-Chief is running amok in Washington, looking for other institutions to destroy.
Someone needs to be finding a way to invoke the 25th Amendment, and I sure as hell don't think it's going to get done on vacation.
Messing with our right to vote is the most dangerous thing Trump has yet done.
I truly don't understand why someone hasn't shot him before now. He is guilty of treason and bribery, both impeachable offenses according to the Constitution. He lied when he took the oath of office because he never intended to respect it. He is clearly out of his mind, as many of us have now said for months.
Congress is on vacation. And they wonder why their approval rating is approaching single digits?
The Postal Service Inspector General has reportedly begun an investigation, but someone needs to be holding their feet to the fire if there are going to be results in time to help the situation.
We in turn have to hold our Congressional representatives' feet to that fire. Call them, email them, be a pain in their ass until you can get assurance from them that they will put the Postal Service scandal at the very top of their agenda and not check it off until we can all see some demonstrable and acceptable progress.
1,000 Americans are dying daily from COVID-19 and Congress can't figure out how to get money to those who need it. And they go on vacation?
I think we need to take a hard look at who's paying for that vacation.
--- Diogenes, 8/16/2020
¹ I know Hillary won the popular vote; the Electoral College elected Trump.
Donald J. Trump is attempting to rob us of the vote.
The right to vote is central to our freedom, indeed to the very existence of our country. The popular election of a chief executive was such a new idea in the 18th century that the Framers spelled out its process at length in Article II, Section 1 (since amended) of the Constitution.
The Constitution itself has been amended no fewer than six times for the purpose of expanding suffrage: 15th Amendment, 1870, allowed voting regardless of race, color, previous condition of servitude; 17th, 1913, provided direct election of senators; 19th, 1920, allowed voting regardless of sex; 23rd, 1961, D.C. residents allowed to vote in presidential elections; 24th, 1964, banned poll taxes; and 26th, 1971, dropped voting age from 21 to 18. Additionally, many Congressional acts expanded the right to vote.
Maintaining a democracy takes work. Everyone has a part to play, and our part as voters is the most important. We decide the shape and makeup of the government.
Our elected officials do the heavy lifting, but we elect them and can remove them from office when we think they're not doing the job we elected them to do.
It all works as long as everyone plays by the rules. It worked until 2016, when the voting public suffered a psychotic break and elected¹ as president a freakish person who has no use for rules and has no history whatsoever of public service.
That person, the unpresident, Donald John Trump, believes he owns everything he controls, and he believes he controls the office of president of the United States of America. He will stop at nothing, and I mean nothing, to remain in that office.
That's why he wants to steal the vote from all of us.
Although he and his family regularly use them, Trump has long criticized mail-in ballots as a source of voting fraud. There is no truth to those claims.
Mail-in ballots are used by people who can't get to their polling place on Election Day. It's also called an absentee ballot because it was first used by Civil War soldiers far from their homes. It's still widely used by members of the armed forces and many others: disabled and/or homebound persons, business travelers, hospitalized people, people with second homes, and the Hypocrite-in-Chief and his family.
Since the beginning of this year it's been anticipated that a greater number of Americans than usual will use it to avoid exposure to COVID-19. That scares the Jackass-in-Chief because he knows a lot of those people won't vote for him, and he can't control or manipulate that part of the vote.
So he's decided to disable the U. S. Postal Service. It's like using a shotgun to kill a fly, but overkill has always been the Trump way.
He is attempting, through his puppet Postmaster General Louis Dejoy, to gut the Postal Service, making it impossible for it to get ballots to people who want them and for mail-in voters to get their ballots to their election officers by the deadline. He has removed sorting machines and other equipment and technology central to mail delivery from post offices and other stations, taken away curbside mailboxes, and will no doubt begin closing post offices wholesale if he isn't stopped.
Dejoy is a toady who essentially bought his position with a $2 million donation to the Trump campaign, and now he's doing his master's bidding: Doing his best to slow down, if not stop, mail delivery, and lying through his teeth about the state of the Postal Service.
Ten states now have universal mail-in voting: California, Colorado, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Jersey, Oregon, Utah, Vermont, and Washington. Need I say that nine of them are "blue" states? Denying the vote to those states alone will disenfranchise approximately 29 million Americans.
Then there are the approximately 650,000 military personnel whom Trump claims to value who won't be able to vote.
The most bizarre thing about this is that Trump seems not to understand that he's disenfranchising members of both parties. He doesn't care. when he has an idea in his diseased mind he pursues it relentlessly.
Congress might be able to do something about the situation, but they're treating it all as business as usual, and have all gone home for their summer break. That, I say, is unconscionable. The economy is in a mess, people have no money, our most important right is at peril, and they're on vacation.
I don't know about you, but that's not what I voted for them to do.
And every day they're out of their offices the Idiot Child-in-Chief is running amok in Washington, looking for other institutions to destroy.
Someone needs to be finding a way to invoke the 25th Amendment, and I sure as hell don't think it's going to get done on vacation.
Messing with our right to vote is the most dangerous thing Trump has yet done.
I truly don't understand why someone hasn't shot him before now. He is guilty of treason and bribery, both impeachable offenses according to the Constitution. He lied when he took the oath of office because he never intended to respect it. He is clearly out of his mind, as many of us have now said for months.
Congress is on vacation. And they wonder why their approval rating is approaching single digits?
The Postal Service Inspector General has reportedly begun an investigation, but someone needs to be holding their feet to the fire if there are going to be results in time to help the situation.
We in turn have to hold our Congressional representatives' feet to that fire. Call them, email them, be a pain in their ass until you can get assurance from them that they will put the Postal Service scandal at the very top of their agenda and not check it off until we can all see some demonstrable and acceptable progress.
1,000 Americans are dying daily from COVID-19 and Congress can't figure out how to get money to those who need it. And they go on vacation?
I think we need to take a hard look at who's paying for that vacation.
--- Diogenes, 8/16/2020
¹ I know Hillary won the popular vote; the Electoral College elected Trump.
Ship Of Fools
"The Ship of Fools" was a 1965 Stanley Kramer film based on the 1962 novel of the same title by Katherine Anne Porter. The plot followed the stories and interactions of passengers on an ocean liner traveling from Mexico to Germany in 1931. Porter intended the book to be a microcosm of human foibles in the years prior to WWII.
She took her title from a late 15th-century satirical poem by Sebastian Brant that concerned a ship sailing to the Fools' Paradise. Brant in turn based his poem on a section of Book 6 of Plato's Republic. Plato tells an allegorical story of a dysfunctional and incompetent crew trying to sail a ship. The allegory refers to the difficulties experienced by a society trying to develop and live with democracy, a new concept of governance at the time.
Here is that allegory, in a contemporary translation by Tom Griffith. I think it closely resembles the Trump administration:
There’s the shipowner, larger and stronger than everyone in the ship, but somewhat deaf and rather short-sighted, with a knowledge of sailing to match his eyesight. The sailors are quarrelling among themselves over captaincy of the ship, each one thinking that he ought to be captain, though he has never learnt that skill, nor can he point to the person who taught him or a time when he was learning it. On top of which they say it can’t be taught. In fact they’re prepared to cut to pieces anyone who says it can. The shipowner himself is always surrounded by them. They beg him and do everything they can to make him hand over the tiller to them. Sometimes, if other people can persuade him and they can’t, they kill those others or throw them overboard. Then they immobilise their worthy shipowner with drugs or drink or by some other means, and take control of the ship, helping themselves to what it is carrying. Drinking and feasting, they sail in the way you’d expect people like that to sail. More than that, if someone is good at finding them ways of persuading or compelling the shipowner to let them take control, they call him a real seaman, a real captain, and say he really knows about ships. Anyone who can’t do this they treat with contempt, calling him useless. They don’t even begin to understand that if he is to be truly fit to take command of a ship a real ship’s captain must of necessity be thoroughly familiar with the seasons of the year, the stars in the sky, the winds, and everything to do with his art. As for how he is going to steer the ship - regardless of whether anyone wants him to or not - they do not regard this as an additional skill or study which can be acquired over and above the art of being a ship’s captain. If this is the situation on board, don’t you think the person who is genuinely equipped to be captain will be called a stargazer, a chatterer, of no use to them, by those who sail in ships with this kind of crew? 1
This is America today: Adrift with no one capable of steering on board.
--- Diogenes, 8/16/2020
¹ Plato, The Republic, Tom Griffith, trans., Cambridge University Press. p. 191-192.
She took her title from a late 15th-century satirical poem by Sebastian Brant that concerned a ship sailing to the Fools' Paradise. Brant in turn based his poem on a section of Book 6 of Plato's Republic. Plato tells an allegorical story of a dysfunctional and incompetent crew trying to sail a ship. The allegory refers to the difficulties experienced by a society trying to develop and live with democracy, a new concept of governance at the time.
Here is that allegory, in a contemporary translation by Tom Griffith. I think it closely resembles the Trump administration:
There’s the shipowner, larger and stronger than everyone in the ship, but somewhat deaf and rather short-sighted, with a knowledge of sailing to match his eyesight. The sailors are quarrelling among themselves over captaincy of the ship, each one thinking that he ought to be captain, though he has never learnt that skill, nor can he point to the person who taught him or a time when he was learning it. On top of which they say it can’t be taught. In fact they’re prepared to cut to pieces anyone who says it can. The shipowner himself is always surrounded by them. They beg him and do everything they can to make him hand over the tiller to them. Sometimes, if other people can persuade him and they can’t, they kill those others or throw them overboard. Then they immobilise their worthy shipowner with drugs or drink or by some other means, and take control of the ship, helping themselves to what it is carrying. Drinking and feasting, they sail in the way you’d expect people like that to sail. More than that, if someone is good at finding them ways of persuading or compelling the shipowner to let them take control, they call him a real seaman, a real captain, and say he really knows about ships. Anyone who can’t do this they treat with contempt, calling him useless. They don’t even begin to understand that if he is to be truly fit to take command of a ship a real ship’s captain must of necessity be thoroughly familiar with the seasons of the year, the stars in the sky, the winds, and everything to do with his art. As for how he is going to steer the ship - regardless of whether anyone wants him to or not - they do not regard this as an additional skill or study which can be acquired over and above the art of being a ship’s captain. If this is the situation on board, don’t you think the person who is genuinely equipped to be captain will be called a stargazer, a chatterer, of no use to them, by those who sail in ships with this kind of crew? 1
This is America today: Adrift with no one capable of steering on board.
--- Diogenes, 8/16/2020
¹ Plato, The Republic, Tom Griffith, trans., Cambridge University Press. p. 191-192.
14 August 2020
STOP TRUMP!!! Save The USPS.
". . . absentee good. Universal mail-in, very bad."¹
Pop quiz: What's the difference between an absentee ballot and a mail-in ballot?
Being the smart folks you all are, everyone answered "none," right?
Precisely. That's a test the Jackass-in-Chief couldn't pass, because he thinks they're two separate things.
He also calls mail-in voting "universal mail-in," which isn't on anybody's radar except the states that have voting exclusively by mail: California, Colorado, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Oregon, Utah, Vermont, and Washington.
Here's the point: Tyrannical Trump has essentially said in so many words that he intends to disable the functionality of the U. S. Postal Service so that mail-in ballots won't go anywhere.
Of course Congress is into its August break, which I frankly find unconscionable. Right now they're the one group of people who might be able to do something about the Psycho-in-Chief and they're on vacation, treating the run-up to the most important election of our lifetimes like business as usual.
But the August break means your Congress critters will probably be near home, so it might be easier than usual to reach them. Please reach out, preferably by phone, and let them know in no uncertain terms that you want them to save the Postal Service. This will be especially important to you if you live in one of the vote-by-mail states.
We need to be fighting and making noise now if we expect success in November.
--- Diogenes, 8/14/2020
Share this with everybody you know.
¹ That absurd quote comes from an 8/13 "press conference" that was nothing but a campaign talk. Here's the link to the transcript: https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/donald-trump-coronavirus-task-force-press-conference-transcript-august-13
Pop quiz: What's the difference between an absentee ballot and a mail-in ballot?
Being the smart folks you all are, everyone answered "none," right?
Precisely. That's a test the Jackass-in-Chief couldn't pass, because he thinks they're two separate things.
He also calls mail-in voting "universal mail-in," which isn't on anybody's radar except the states that have voting exclusively by mail: California, Colorado, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Oregon, Utah, Vermont, and Washington.
Here's the point: Tyrannical Trump has essentially said in so many words that he intends to disable the functionality of the U. S. Postal Service so that mail-in ballots won't go anywhere.
Of course Congress is into its August break, which I frankly find unconscionable. Right now they're the one group of people who might be able to do something about the Psycho-in-Chief and they're on vacation, treating the run-up to the most important election of our lifetimes like business as usual.
But the August break means your Congress critters will probably be near home, so it might be easier than usual to reach them. Please reach out, preferably by phone, and let them know in no uncertain terms that you want them to save the Postal Service. This will be especially important to you if you live in one of the vote-by-mail states.
We need to be fighting and making noise now if we expect success in November.
--- Diogenes, 8/14/2020
Share this with everybody you know.
¹ That absurd quote comes from an 8/13 "press conference" that was nothing but a campaign talk. Here's the link to the transcript: https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/donald-trump-coronavirus-task-force-press-conference-transcript-august-13
13 August 2020
Too Stupid To Live (Repost)
I know--we're running past Diogenes posts the way broadcast TV used to do summer reruns. Just hang on a bit longer, please, and enjoy these if you missed them first time.
Today's title is the favorite saying of a former workmate. It's harsh, but there are some cases in which it seems apt.
To wit: People who blindly follow Donald Trump.
Near the top of the long list of things I do not understand is why anyone would follow Trump for any reason. I think they actually don't follow, because he has proven himself not to be a leader. Perhaps a better word would be adherents: they are drawn to him unconsciously, and just sort of clump around him.
Having thought about this for a while I've decided Trump's human conglomeration can be divided into four groups, as follows:
Toadies and minions
These are people who are in some way beholden to the unpresident or feel a strong attraction to him. The group includes his staff, the Cabinet, associate Supreme Court justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, and probably most Congressional Republicans.
For many politicians, bureaucrats, and functionaries, D. C. is Nirvana, the Promised Land, and El Dorado. Most of them are power junkies who prize being near the center of power above all. The closer they can bind themselves to the chief executive, the more power adheres to them. Many of this group don't care who the president is. All they want is to keep hanging on to a job that keeps them near the Omphalos of government, and they will do anything the incumbent asks of them to stay in it.
The Party Faithful
There is some overlap between this group and the toadies and minions, but it isn't huge. By and large these people have been staunch Republicans all their lives, and are likely the children of Republicans. A good number of them have been in office far too long. They still wistfully refer to the Grand Old Party, but deep down they know the Republican Party is broken. The president is nominally Republican, but they can't go to him to fix it, because they now know he's the one who broke it. Nonetheless, when November 3 rolls around they will hold their noses and vote for him, because, by God, they're Republicans, and they vote for Republicans, period.
The Mob
I don't know if The Mob is the largest of these four groups, but they are the ones who are most visible and make the most noise. I equate them with British yobs, who can turn any soccer match into a bar brawl.
They're not political. They come out for the action, to confront protesters and/or cops, to strut around shirtless waving Trump flags, to pointedly defy rules (e.g. wearing masks), and to shout slogans about foreigners and minorities. If they have a goal it is to show the Dumbass-in-Chief that they are men, too, and they identify with his anger and his displeasure with anyone who doesn't agree with him or isn't like him. (I'm sorry for all the masculine pronouns, but this group is testosterone fueled.)
The Fringe
This is the group I was thinking of when I decided on the title. The fringe is the group that gets their news from social media and takes as Gospel anything uttered by their ultra-right authority figure du jour, be it the Idiot Child-in-Chief, Archdemon Mitch McConnell, the faceless Q of Qanon, Sean Hannity, or their foreman at work.
They propagate and embroider conspiracy theories with such outrageous premises that any reasonable (not to say sane) person would reject them out of hand. Yet they hold to these beliefs like religion because someone they believe to be in authority said it was so. It's easy to dismiss them as gullible fools and paranoiacs, but we would do so at our peril.
Because these people so desperately need something to follow or to believe in, they will believe virtually anything. They become easy to manipulate, and the darker corners of the Web where they like to hang out are perfect places to recruit and persuade them to a cause. If all this sounds just too "out there," I recommend this:
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/06/qanon-nothing-can-stop-what-is-coming/610567/
Don't read it before bed.
--- Diogenes, 8/13/2020 Reposted 10/14/2020
Please share widely.
12 August 2020
Don't Laugh
Yesterday I caught myself chuckling about a Trump idiocy one of my colleagues here at Vox Populi had related to me.
It suddenly occurred to me to ask if it was really funny. It's almost too easy to laugh at the Lunatic-in-Chief. Even making up names to call him (thereby stooping to his level) makes the process seem whimsical. We laugh at him because he's such a pathetic caricature of a leader. We sometimes even cringe when he says or does something especially egregious, as if we feel sorry for him.
We must not. We must never let empathy or sympathy or compassion cloud our vision of what he truly is: cheat, liar, coward, bully, cretin, adulterer, traitor, imbecile, creep, criminal, ass, bigot, loser.
I am tempted to add mass murderer of the thousands of Americans who have died of COVID-19 because of his criminal negligence in not even attempting to find a response to the disease, but I won't.
The response Americans should have toward him is raw hatred, screaming incandescent anger, a collective emotional pulse to make his head explode, a nationwide prayer for him to contract a massive case of COVID-19.
The thing I fear most about this election is that the Biden-Harris campaign won't fight dirty enough. Republicans almost always fight dirty. It was they who gave us Watergate, the "birther" absurdity, Iran-Contra, and Earl Butz. And that's just a sampling since the middle of the 20th century.
Democrats tend not to get what it takes. They don't get rage. Not paltry anger, but rage: The head-banging, bare-knuckle, red-mist-in-front-of-the-eyes emotion that comes so easily to the Ragged Right. I'm not suggesting that Biden challenge Trump to a fistfight, but I do wish the Democratic Party could muster the gumption to launch an all-out dirty-tricks, in-your-face, no-holds-barred campaign.
They probably won't because they're afraid the Litigant-in-Chief will sue them, but what the hell? He'll sue them anyway. Might as well get sued for something worthwhile. And another thing: The Republicans will sacrifice anything and anyone for victory. The Democrats have to be just as heartless if they're going to win.
I'm not talking about our parents' Democratic Party here, or even my generation's. I'm talking about a party that is going to have to adopt some distasteful practices if it hopes to meet the Republican incumbent and his mass of goons, foreign and domestic, on a level field.
I don't care how melodramatic it sounds, this election will be for the fate of the United States of America.
The Constitution must remain intact if this country is to survive. I fear it won't if Trump is re-elected.
--- Diogenes, 8/12/2020
It suddenly occurred to me to ask if it was really funny. It's almost too easy to laugh at the Lunatic-in-Chief. Even making up names to call him (thereby stooping to his level) makes the process seem whimsical. We laugh at him because he's such a pathetic caricature of a leader. We sometimes even cringe when he says or does something especially egregious, as if we feel sorry for him.
We must not. We must never let empathy or sympathy or compassion cloud our vision of what he truly is: cheat, liar, coward, bully, cretin, adulterer, traitor, imbecile, creep, criminal, ass, bigot, loser.
I am tempted to add mass murderer of the thousands of Americans who have died of COVID-19 because of his criminal negligence in not even attempting to find a response to the disease, but I won't.
The response Americans should have toward him is raw hatred, screaming incandescent anger, a collective emotional pulse to make his head explode, a nationwide prayer for him to contract a massive case of COVID-19.
The thing I fear most about this election is that the Biden-Harris campaign won't fight dirty enough. Republicans almost always fight dirty. It was they who gave us Watergate, the "birther" absurdity, Iran-Contra, and Earl Butz. And that's just a sampling since the middle of the 20th century.
Democrats tend not to get what it takes. They don't get rage. Not paltry anger, but rage: The head-banging, bare-knuckle, red-mist-in-front-of-the-eyes emotion that comes so easily to the Ragged Right. I'm not suggesting that Biden challenge Trump to a fistfight, but I do wish the Democratic Party could muster the gumption to launch an all-out dirty-tricks, in-your-face, no-holds-barred campaign.
They probably won't because they're afraid the Litigant-in-Chief will sue them, but what the hell? He'll sue them anyway. Might as well get sued for something worthwhile. And another thing: The Republicans will sacrifice anything and anyone for victory. The Democrats have to be just as heartless if they're going to win.
I'm not talking about our parents' Democratic Party here, or even my generation's. I'm talking about a party that is going to have to adopt some distasteful practices if it hopes to meet the Republican incumbent and his mass of goons, foreign and domestic, on a level field.
I don't care how melodramatic it sounds, this election will be for the fate of the United States of America.
The Constitution must remain intact if this country is to survive. I fear it won't if Trump is re-elected.
--- Diogenes, 8/12/2020
10 August 2020
J'Accuse
Not enough people are speaking seriously of the widespread criminal behavior that infects the Trump administration. So I will.
I accuse:
Donald J. Trump of treason for his secret collusion with Vladimir Putin and other potential enemies to interfere with the electoral process and to undermine the stability of the U. S. government.
Donald J. Trump of criminally negligent manslaughter for the deaths of 160,000 Americans from COVID-19.
Donald J. Trump of fraud and intent to defraud the American people with false promises and frivolous executive orders made only to enhance his chances of re-election.
Donald J. Trump of misuse of federal funds and resources for political gain.
Michael R. Pence of aiding and abetting the above acts.
The Cabinet, collectively, of violating their oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic" by failing to invoke the 25th Amendment, relieving Trump of his presidential duties.
Attorney General William P. Barr of criminal assault, attempted murder, and criminal trespass for allowing federal agents to occupy American cities and act against American citizens exercising their Constitutional rights.
The Congress, collectively, for malfeasance and abandonment of their oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic."
Addison Mitchell McConnell Jr. for inciting other members of Congress to act contrary to their sworn oath.
Addison Mitchell McConnell Jr. for conspiring with the president, other members of the administration, and other members of Congress selectively to block or promote legislation that would negatively affect the voting rights of Americans.
The Supreme Court, collectively, for taking blatantly political stands in violation of their oath to "administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and . . . faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me."
Chad Wolf, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, FBI Director Christopher A. Wray, and Secret Service Director James M. Murray for grossly endangering the American public by colluding with members of the administration not to hamper the actions of a clearly delusional president.
To this list I add five crimes Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) allege Donald J. Trump committed in connection with his shadowy dealings with Ukraine:
The penalty for treason is death.
--- Diogenes, 8/10/2020
Please share widely.
I accuse:
Donald J. Trump of treason for his secret collusion with Vladimir Putin and other potential enemies to interfere with the electoral process and to undermine the stability of the U. S. government.
Donald J. Trump of criminally negligent manslaughter for the deaths of 160,000 Americans from COVID-19.
Donald J. Trump of fraud and intent to defraud the American people with false promises and frivolous executive orders made only to enhance his chances of re-election.
Donald J. Trump of misuse of federal funds and resources for political gain.
Michael R. Pence of aiding and abetting the above acts.
The Cabinet, collectively, of violating their oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic" by failing to invoke the 25th Amendment, relieving Trump of his presidential duties.
Attorney General William P. Barr of criminal assault, attempted murder, and criminal trespass for allowing federal agents to occupy American cities and act against American citizens exercising their Constitutional rights.
The Congress, collectively, for malfeasance and abandonment of their oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic."
Addison Mitchell McConnell Jr. for inciting other members of Congress to act contrary to their sworn oath.
Addison Mitchell McConnell Jr. for conspiring with the president, other members of the administration, and other members of Congress selectively to block or promote legislation that would negatively affect the voting rights of Americans.
The Supreme Court, collectively, for taking blatantly political stands in violation of their oath to "administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and . . . faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me."
Chad Wolf, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, FBI Director Christopher A. Wray, and Secret Service Director James M. Murray for grossly endangering the American public by colluding with members of the administration not to hamper the actions of a clearly delusional president.
To this list I add five crimes Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) allege Donald J. Trump committed in connection with his shadowy dealings with Ukraine:
- Bribery
- Soliciting foreign campaign contribution
- Coercion of political activity
- Misappropriation of federal funds
- Obstruction of Congress
The penalty for treason is death.
--- Diogenes, 8/10/2020
Please share widely.
09 August 2020
The Open Road
Americans tend to think of it in capital letters.
The Road is a path to new worlds, new people, adventure, and excitement. The Road can take you to oceans, mountains, deserts, and swamps. It can lead you around and through this magnificent land of ours. It offers smooth cruising and white-knuckle cliffside corkscrews. It's the route through old-growth forests and seedy downtowns, to monuments and burned-out neighborhoods, to waterfalls and bayous.
The Road is a legend peopled with wanderers, vagabonds, hoboes, and minstrels. It carried the Great Migration that saw some six million Blacks leave the South for Northern jobs and equality; it gave hope to three million Okies headed for the promised land of California; it's where you go if life becomes unbearable.
The spirit of The Road is best represented by one iconic machine: the motorcycle. Sturdy, agile, and fast, bikes are the ultimate statement of freedom. They're a way out, an escape. No other vehicle represents a quick getaway quite like the motorcycle.
It's estimated there are about 13 million motorcycles in the United States. We all probably have some stereotypical image of a biker, but considering that eight percent of American households own at least one bike, it's almost certainly wrong. Ask anybody which movie best typifies biker culture, and you'll get a range of "wild" answers from "The Wild One" to "The Wild Angels" to "Wild Hogs," and any others, and they'll all be right. Bikers come in all sizes, colors, races, genders, and socioeconomic strata.
Every August thousands of them gather in Sturgis, South Dakota. You remember South Dakota, right? The state governed by pro-Trump COVID-19 denier Kristi Noem where the Fool-in-Chief hired an audience to watch him read a fifth-grade history lesson about the presidents carved into Mount Rushmore before having a photo taken that appears to show him joining them.
But I digress. Governor Noem has imposed virtually no COVID-19 restrictions anywhere, so for 10 days beginning the day before yesterday Sturgis is going to be one huge viral swamp.
I've taken a couple of days off to research this year's event in order to avoid the trap of stereotyping, and I offer the following with reasonable certainty.
Yes, the biker community is heterogeneous, but this year's gathering is likely less so. The 80th Sturgis rally is now estimated to draw between 100,000 and 250,000 bikers and aficionados. That is a lot, but way down from last year's attendance of nearly half a million.
When throngs of people with a special interest are reduced, true believers are the distillate, and I expect the majority of Sturgis attendees are going to be hard-core freedom-loving bikers who aren't going to wear masks or observe COVID-19 precations generally. Sturgis is a party, with lots of drinking, drugs, back slapping, hugging, and sex. Crowds will be shoulder-to-shoulder at bars, concerts, and other rally events.
Sturgis is an international event, which means anyone infected there could pass the virus on to a great many people. Not surprisingly, a lot of attendees are Trump supporters. Why? It's not political. They identify with his "I'm number one," "take what you want" attitude and his incessant anger. Not a few of them, I suspect, are "Sons of Anarchy" wannabes.
Native American communities have closed roads that lead to Sturgis and banned rally traffic on or through their territories. I'm sure the residents of Sturgis wish they could do the same. They were overwhelmingly opposed to the rally this year. But the event brings a lot of income to area businesses. Money talks, and the city council listened.
Thanks to Governor Noem's laissez-faire policy and the city council's avarice, the 2020 Sturgis rally may be remembered less as a party and more as a visitation by the Grim Reaper.
I hope not. I really do. I love The Road, and would hate for anyone's experience of it to be tainted by disease. Still, those who live large and take unnecessary risks have to expect some payback.
Ride fast, party hard, suffer the consequences.
---Diogenes, 8/9/2020
Please share as widely as possible.
07 August 2020
Eating Worms
"Nobody likes me, everybody hates me, guess I'll go eat worms."
Now that the real news folks have tired of DJTrump's interesting comment on his unpopularity, it's our turn to have a shot at it.
In case you missed it or don't remember, the statement came during a COVID-19 White House press briefing on July 28. As usual the "briefing" was a series of repeated tropes on ventilators, inept governors, testing, and the importance of blocking China.
At about 20 minutes into the briefing, responding to a question about his relationship with Dr. Anthony Fauci, the Mooncalf-in-Chief gave a typically self-contradictory answer, then went into ruminative mode, considering the relative popularity of Fauci, Dr. Deborah Birx, and himself.
He came to this conclusion: "So it sort of is curious: A man works for us — with us, very closely, Dr. Fauci, and Dr. Birx also highly thought of. And yet, they’re highly thought of, but nobody likes me. It can only be my personality. That’s all."
Let's parse that a bit. The delivery is uncolored, in almost a conversational tone. In the first sentence he redefines Fauci's status three times, elevating it each time: "A man works for us--with us, very closely." It's as if he's hoping to avoid another question about Fauci by precisely defining where Fauci stands relative to the Omphalos, i.e. DJTrump himself.
There's also a slight hint of discovery in that first sentence, as if he's just figured out that Fauci works with him--or for him, whichever.
The mention of Birx appears to be an afterthought. You can almost see the gears in his head working, churning out the thought that there's someone else he should mention, then the "Oh, yeah" moment.
Moving to the second sentence, there's that surprising admission: "Nobody likes me." Contrary to some commenters and analysts, that line is not delivered in a self-pitying way, but is stated matter-of-factly, with no noticeable emotion.
What is surprising to Trump here is that someone close to him can be "highly thought of" while he is not. He has continuously held to the idea that as the center of all things, all glory, popularity, and fame adhere to him, and are radiated to those around him as splendor emanates from a godhead.
And yet the notion that he's a dark center while those around him are esteemed does not appear to be a revelation to the Grand Poohbah. Rather, it sounds like something he has thought about for a while and he's turning to the press as an interlocutor. Then he says simply, without inflection, "Nobody likes me."
He states it as a fact. He knows it. He's not bothered by it because the adulation of lesser beings isn't important to him. He knows that he alone is important to the world, and these other names he mentions are nothing.
"Nobody likes me" is the phrase most people locked onto, but I think the penultimate sentence is most telling: "It can only be my personality." Whoa! Let's recontextualize that: "[The reason nobody likes me] can only be my personality."
Do you get what that is? That's Trump taking responsibility for people not liking him. He's not pointing fingers, not transferring the fault to someone else. We've not seen this, have we? Anywhere? Granted, he does speak of his personality as if it's something separate from him, but there's no way he can be separated from it.
"That's all" at the end is a throwaway line to get back into taking questions.
I opened this post with a line from a children's song because it reflects the usual response to being disliked. Trump is nowhere near ready to eat worms, and I think his flat emotional response to being disliked is a good indicator of his abysmal level of emotional intelligence.
Still, knowing that he knows he is disliked is another tool in the struggle.
---Diogenes, 8/7/2020
Now that the real news folks have tired of DJTrump's interesting comment on his unpopularity, it's our turn to have a shot at it.
In case you missed it or don't remember, the statement came during a COVID-19 White House press briefing on July 28. As usual the "briefing" was a series of repeated tropes on ventilators, inept governors, testing, and the importance of blocking China.
At about 20 minutes into the briefing, responding to a question about his relationship with Dr. Anthony Fauci, the Mooncalf-in-Chief gave a typically self-contradictory answer, then went into ruminative mode, considering the relative popularity of Fauci, Dr. Deborah Birx, and himself.
He came to this conclusion: "So it sort of is curious: A man works for us — with us, very closely, Dr. Fauci, and Dr. Birx also highly thought of. And yet, they’re highly thought of, but nobody likes me. It can only be my personality. That’s all."
Let's parse that a bit. The delivery is uncolored, in almost a conversational tone. In the first sentence he redefines Fauci's status three times, elevating it each time: "A man works for us--with us, very closely." It's as if he's hoping to avoid another question about Fauci by precisely defining where Fauci stands relative to the Omphalos, i.e. DJTrump himself.
There's also a slight hint of discovery in that first sentence, as if he's just figured out that Fauci works with him--or for him, whichever.
The mention of Birx appears to be an afterthought. You can almost see the gears in his head working, churning out the thought that there's someone else he should mention, then the "Oh, yeah" moment.
Moving to the second sentence, there's that surprising admission: "Nobody likes me." Contrary to some commenters and analysts, that line is not delivered in a self-pitying way, but is stated matter-of-factly, with no noticeable emotion.
What is surprising to Trump here is that someone close to him can be "highly thought of" while he is not. He has continuously held to the idea that as the center of all things, all glory, popularity, and fame adhere to him, and are radiated to those around him as splendor emanates from a godhead.
And yet the notion that he's a dark center while those around him are esteemed does not appear to be a revelation to the Grand Poohbah. Rather, it sounds like something he has thought about for a while and he's turning to the press as an interlocutor. Then he says simply, without inflection, "Nobody likes me."
He states it as a fact. He knows it. He's not bothered by it because the adulation of lesser beings isn't important to him. He knows that he alone is important to the world, and these other names he mentions are nothing.
"Nobody likes me" is the phrase most people locked onto, but I think the penultimate sentence is most telling: "It can only be my personality." Whoa! Let's recontextualize that: "[The reason nobody likes me] can only be my personality."
Do you get what that is? That's Trump taking responsibility for people not liking him. He's not pointing fingers, not transferring the fault to someone else. We've not seen this, have we? Anywhere? Granted, he does speak of his personality as if it's something separate from him, but there's no way he can be separated from it.
"That's all" at the end is a throwaway line to get back into taking questions.
I opened this post with a line from a children's song because it reflects the usual response to being disliked. Trump is nowhere near ready to eat worms, and I think his flat emotional response to being disliked is a good indicator of his abysmal level of emotional intelligence.
Still, knowing that he knows he is disliked is another tool in the struggle.
---Diogenes, 8/7/2020
05 August 2020
It Is What It Is
"It is what it is"--The mid-twentieth century statement of an absolute that has become a twenty-first-century dismissive, joining "Oh, well" and "Whatever."
"It is what it is." It's one of those phrases that sounds vaguely intellectual or philosophical. It is in fact, a gross oversimplification of Immanuel Kant's concept of "das Ding an sich," a "thing-in-itself" that exists outside human perception and knowing. The similarity is no doubt coincidental.
"It is what it is." People use it as a throwaway phrase to close conversations about something they either don't like or don't want to talk about.
"It is what it is" was the Jerk-in-Chief's throwaway line when he was recently reminded of the COVID-19 death toll by Jonathan Swan on AXIOS news. He first claimed that the pandemic was under control, then said, “They are dying. That’s true. And you – it is what it is.”
"It is what it is." People die, and when they do it is customary to offer condolences and perhaps a bright note about something in their life. We all have an aversion to death, but it is, after all, the price of living. The Denier-in-Chief must have a special hatred of it because he won't deal with it. Perhaps he fears it because he knows it is the one thing that he absolutely cannot control. Or perhaps he thinks if he ignores it, it will go away.
"It is what it is." On May 28, nearly six months into the pandemic and the day the U.S. COVID death toll reached 100,000, the Great Twit tweeted his one and only message acknowledging the great loss of life: “To all of the families & friends of those who have passed, I want to extend my heartfelt sympathy & love for everything that these great people stood for & represent. God be with you!”
"It is what it is." A mass message is better than nothing, I suppose. But what about some opportunities to join personally in the celebrations of other lives? It is traditional for presidents to attend the funerals of important Americans, but with one exception, the Avoider-in-Chief has chosen not to honor the fallen with his presence (the honor would proceed from the office of POTUS, not the individual holding the office).
"It is what it is." During his time in office, DJTrump has attended exactly one state funeral: that of former President George H. W. Bush--and he was not welcome. He could have but chose not to attend services for former First Lady Barbara Bush, Rep. Elijah Cummings, Rep. John Dingell, Rep. John Lewis, and Sen. John McCain.
“They are dying. That’s true. And you – it is what it is.” The Great Pretender has only disdain for the American people, living or dead. He may be able to relate to 100,000 (now more than 165,000) as a big number but that is all it is to him--a number. He has no sympathy for the actual people or their families. Mostly he wishes they would just go away.
How to visualize that many people? This is a satellite photo of Salinas, California, population approximately 155,000.
Salinas is about five miles square. Imagine it as a ghost town. Imagine walking through streets with thousands of vacant homes, stores, and industrial buildings. No traffic, no sounds, no life, nothing moving that's not blown by the wind. No smells of food, smoke, sewage, or diesel. No sensory input at all.
That's what 155,000 missing souls feels like.
COVID-19 is beginning its second wave, and is starting to have a significant impact on the population of our country. Cities similar in size to Salinas are Springfield, MA, Bellevue, WA, and Alexandria, VA. If you're close to any of them, visit. Take a drive around and imagine it as a ghost town. Think of the economic impact of losing hundreds of thousands of people.
The Denier-in-Chief will not look at this, will not acknowledge it, will not mourn the dead nor comfort the surviving. It has nothing to do with him because he feels nothing outside the bounds of his imaginary world.
Yet COVID-19, hand in hand with Death, marches on.
It is what it is.
---Diogenes, 8/5/2020
Please share as widely as possible.
"It is what it is." It's one of those phrases that sounds vaguely intellectual or philosophical. It is in fact, a gross oversimplification of Immanuel Kant's concept of "das Ding an sich," a "thing-in-itself" that exists outside human perception and knowing. The similarity is no doubt coincidental.
"It is what it is." People use it as a throwaway phrase to close conversations about something they either don't like or don't want to talk about.
"It is what it is" was the Jerk-in-Chief's throwaway line when he was recently reminded of the COVID-19 death toll by Jonathan Swan on AXIOS news. He first claimed that the pandemic was under control, then said, “They are dying. That’s true. And you – it is what it is.”
"It is what it is." People die, and when they do it is customary to offer condolences and perhaps a bright note about something in their life. We all have an aversion to death, but it is, after all, the price of living. The Denier-in-Chief must have a special hatred of it because he won't deal with it. Perhaps he fears it because he knows it is the one thing that he absolutely cannot control. Or perhaps he thinks if he ignores it, it will go away.
"It is what it is." On May 28, nearly six months into the pandemic and the day the U.S. COVID death toll reached 100,000, the Great Twit tweeted his one and only message acknowledging the great loss of life: “To all of the families & friends of those who have passed, I want to extend my heartfelt sympathy & love for everything that these great people stood for & represent. God be with you!”
"It is what it is." A mass message is better than nothing, I suppose. But what about some opportunities to join personally in the celebrations of other lives? It is traditional for presidents to attend the funerals of important Americans, but with one exception, the Avoider-in-Chief has chosen not to honor the fallen with his presence (the honor would proceed from the office of POTUS, not the individual holding the office).
"It is what it is." During his time in office, DJTrump has attended exactly one state funeral: that of former President George H. W. Bush--and he was not welcome. He could have but chose not to attend services for former First Lady Barbara Bush, Rep. Elijah Cummings, Rep. John Dingell, Rep. John Lewis, and Sen. John McCain.
“They are dying. That’s true. And you – it is what it is.” The Great Pretender has only disdain for the American people, living or dead. He may be able to relate to 100,000 (now more than 165,000) as a big number but that is all it is to him--a number. He has no sympathy for the actual people or their families. Mostly he wishes they would just go away.
How to visualize that many people? This is a satellite photo of Salinas, California, population approximately 155,000.
Salinas is about five miles square. Imagine it as a ghost town. Imagine walking through streets with thousands of vacant homes, stores, and industrial buildings. No traffic, no sounds, no life, nothing moving that's not blown by the wind. No smells of food, smoke, sewage, or diesel. No sensory input at all.
That's what 155,000 missing souls feels like.
COVID-19 is beginning its second wave, and is starting to have a significant impact on the population of our country. Cities similar in size to Salinas are Springfield, MA, Bellevue, WA, and Alexandria, VA. If you're close to any of them, visit. Take a drive around and imagine it as a ghost town. Think of the economic impact of losing hundreds of thousands of people.
The Denier-in-Chief will not look at this, will not acknowledge it, will not mourn the dead nor comfort the surviving. It has nothing to do with him because he feels nothing outside the bounds of his imaginary world.
Yet COVID-19, hand in hand with Death, marches on.
It is what it is.
---Diogenes, 8/5/2020
Please share as widely as possible.
04 August 2020
On Hiding
There are four major reasons people hide things: Fear, Greed, Guilt, and Shame.
Donald John Trump has a lot of stuff hidden.
DJTrump thinks he's smart and says so frequently. "I'm, like, a really smart person." But factual accounts of his student days don't always square with his claim.
Needless to say, his butt never sat at a public school desk. Consider his education:
He attended, in order, the Kew-Forest School, which bills itself as "The oldest independent school in the borough of Queens;" the New York Military Academy, where he was sent in hopes of straightening out his incorrigible bad behavior; Fordham University, a Jesuit school in the Bronx, which his niece alleges he got into by paying someone else to take his SAT; and the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, from which he graduated with the default degree, a B.S. in Economics (he has occasionally boasted of having the prestigious Wharton MBA--not true).
During the 2016 campaign, Trump ordered his minions to threaten all those schools but Kew-Forest with criminal charges if they made the Dunce-in-Chief's academic records public.
Why might the Litigant-in-Chief make such threats? Academic records are already protected by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (FERPA). Threatening a lawsuit would be overkill--the act of a person desperate to keep those records in deep darkness.
This kind of behavior never fails to make us Homo Saps curious. We're naturally nosy. Why hide records? What's the big deal? Come on, Donny, tell!
In my professional life as an educator I've noticed that most students react to grades in one of two ways: with joy and pride, or with disappointment and chagrin. Those who are proud of their grades as an accomplishment boast of them to anyone who will listen. The others go off and sulk.
Trump is a sulker. He has said he was first in his class (without designating a school), but those records that are public are clear: he never achieved honors and was never on a dean's list.
So here's my take on a non-mystery that's as plain as day: Donald John Trump was a terrible, uninterested, and unmotivated student. He spent his time in school playing and doing just enough to avoid flunking. He may have cheated on his SAT, and there is evidence that family connections got him into the Wharton School.
I doubt he cares overmuch about the grades themselves. He managed to get a degree so he could fit into a certain type of society. With the records sealed he could boast and lie about his academic prowess and never be challenged.
What exactly motivated him to bury his records? Unlikely as it sounds, I think it might have been shame, or the fear of being shamed. If the records were revealed somehow he would no doubt dismiss them as forgeries or an attempt to discredit him. But somewhere deep down, maybe the Liar-in-Chief knows that most Americans still have faith in the integrity of America's universities.
Just not in its chief executive.
---Diogenes, 8/4/2020
Donald John Trump has a lot of stuff hidden.
DJTrump thinks he's smart and says so frequently. "I'm, like, a really smart person." But factual accounts of his student days don't always square with his claim.
Needless to say, his butt never sat at a public school desk. Consider his education:
He attended, in order, the Kew-Forest School, which bills itself as "The oldest independent school in the borough of Queens;" the New York Military Academy, where he was sent in hopes of straightening out his incorrigible bad behavior; Fordham University, a Jesuit school in the Bronx, which his niece alleges he got into by paying someone else to take his SAT; and the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, from which he graduated with the default degree, a B.S. in Economics (he has occasionally boasted of having the prestigious Wharton MBA--not true).
During the 2016 campaign, Trump ordered his minions to threaten all those schools but Kew-Forest with criminal charges if they made the Dunce-in-Chief's academic records public.
Why might the Litigant-in-Chief make such threats? Academic records are already protected by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (FERPA). Threatening a lawsuit would be overkill--the act of a person desperate to keep those records in deep darkness.
This kind of behavior never fails to make us Homo Saps curious. We're naturally nosy. Why hide records? What's the big deal? Come on, Donny, tell!
In my professional life as an educator I've noticed that most students react to grades in one of two ways: with joy and pride, or with disappointment and chagrin. Those who are proud of their grades as an accomplishment boast of them to anyone who will listen. The others go off and sulk.
Trump is a sulker. He has said he was first in his class (without designating a school), but those records that are public are clear: he never achieved honors and was never on a dean's list.
So here's my take on a non-mystery that's as plain as day: Donald John Trump was a terrible, uninterested, and unmotivated student. He spent his time in school playing and doing just enough to avoid flunking. He may have cheated on his SAT, and there is evidence that family connections got him into the Wharton School.
I doubt he cares overmuch about the grades themselves. He managed to get a degree so he could fit into a certain type of society. With the records sealed he could boast and lie about his academic prowess and never be challenged.
What exactly motivated him to bury his records? Unlikely as it sounds, I think it might have been shame, or the fear of being shamed. If the records were revealed somehow he would no doubt dismiss them as forgeries or an attempt to discredit him. But somewhere deep down, maybe the Liar-in-Chief knows that most Americans still have faith in the integrity of America's universities.
Just not in its chief executive.
---Diogenes, 8/4/2020
03 August 2020
On Kneeling
We kneel before gods, monarchs, and executioners.
For the first two we take the posture to swear our fealty and allegiance. In the third, so our bodies will not have so far to fall to the ground.
Kneeling is an ancient gesture of respect and submission. It says, "I humble myself before you and I pledge my allegiance to you." It is a reasonable and legitimate way to express one's patriotism.
It is also a protest.
The prescribed manner for saluting the flag and the national anthem is: "During rendition of the national anthem when the flag is displayed, all present except those in uniform should stand at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart."¹
I am not a fan of professional sports, but I admire and respect those players who "take a knee" when the national anthem is played. The action was initially taken by Black players, who have been joined in solidarity by many of their teammates of other races.
In 1787 the British ceramic artist Josiah Wedgwood created a design to be an emblem for abolitionist groups in Great Britain and America. The emblem, featuring a fettered Black slave kneeling, with the caption "Am I not a man and a brother" was a powerful boost to antislavery movements on both continents:
In the context of Black history this image has great power. The slave in the image is a supplicant. Not so those who kneel today. Their intended message is that they will not stand in recognition of a country that enslaved their ancestors and has practiced systemic racism throughout its history up to the present day.
Therein, I think, is an interesting conundrum. Is there a difference in the way one kneels when swearing allegiance and when protesting? Is there some subtle difference in the placement of the knee or the angle at which the head is held? Or is the only difference in the mind of the kneeler? And if that is the case, who's to know for sure the intent of the action?
Regardless of intent, it maddens DJTrump and his ilk. Why? Mightn't it be possible that some of those kneeling are in fact offering allegiance to the United States in their hearts while physically supporting their colleagues?
Doesn't matter. They don't like it because it's not the way they want it to be. They're Conservatives, and they don't like change. They learned to put their hands over their hearts when that song played, and by God that's the only salute that should be allowed. Anything else is rocking the boat, crossing a line, going a step too far--all anathema to Conservatives.
It's one more reminder for the Whiner-in-Chief that things in this nation are moving in ways he can't control. In his mind the only good changes are those he makes, and lately he's been unable to make many, while some have been forced on him. His world is unraveling like that obscene hair he wears.
He despises everyone who is different from him, and that's damned near everyone else on the planet. He fears change, he fears anyone who might be better than him, and he fears patriotism because he's never felt it.
Patriotism lives in the heart, not in actions.
--- Diogenes, 8/3/2020
¹ USC Title 36, Chapter 10, §171. The flag rules are meant as guidelines. They are virtually unenforceable and violation of them carries no penalty.
For the first two we take the posture to swear our fealty and allegiance. In the third, so our bodies will not have so far to fall to the ground.
Kneeling is an ancient gesture of respect and submission. It says, "I humble myself before you and I pledge my allegiance to you." It is a reasonable and legitimate way to express one's patriotism.
It is also a protest.
The prescribed manner for saluting the flag and the national anthem is: "During rendition of the national anthem when the flag is displayed, all present except those in uniform should stand at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart."¹
I am not a fan of professional sports, but I admire and respect those players who "take a knee" when the national anthem is played. The action was initially taken by Black players, who have been joined in solidarity by many of their teammates of other races.
In 1787 the British ceramic artist Josiah Wedgwood created a design to be an emblem for abolitionist groups in Great Britain and America. The emblem, featuring a fettered Black slave kneeling, with the caption "Am I not a man and a brother" was a powerful boost to antislavery movements on both continents:
In the context of Black history this image has great power. The slave in the image is a supplicant. Not so those who kneel today. Their intended message is that they will not stand in recognition of a country that enslaved their ancestors and has practiced systemic racism throughout its history up to the present day.Therein, I think, is an interesting conundrum. Is there a difference in the way one kneels when swearing allegiance and when protesting? Is there some subtle difference in the placement of the knee or the angle at which the head is held? Or is the only difference in the mind of the kneeler? And if that is the case, who's to know for sure the intent of the action?
Regardless of intent, it maddens DJTrump and his ilk. Why? Mightn't it be possible that some of those kneeling are in fact offering allegiance to the United States in their hearts while physically supporting their colleagues?
Doesn't matter. They don't like it because it's not the way they want it to be. They're Conservatives, and they don't like change. They learned to put their hands over their hearts when that song played, and by God that's the only salute that should be allowed. Anything else is rocking the boat, crossing a line, going a step too far--all anathema to Conservatives.
It's one more reminder for the Whiner-in-Chief that things in this nation are moving in ways he can't control. In his mind the only good changes are those he makes, and lately he's been unable to make many, while some have been forced on him. His world is unraveling like that obscene hair he wears.
He despises everyone who is different from him, and that's damned near everyone else on the planet. He fears change, he fears anyone who might be better than him, and he fears patriotism because he's never felt it.
Patriotism lives in the heart, not in actions.
--- Diogenes, 8/3/2020
¹ USC Title 36, Chapter 10, §171. The flag rules are meant as guidelines. They are virtually unenforceable and violation of them carries no penalty.
02 August 2020
36 compelling reasons . . .
. . . to drag the misbegotten DJTrump out of the White House and dump him in the street:
- He is in active and treasonous collusion with Vladimir Putin.
- He has sent armed thugs into American cities to attack the American people.
- His disregard and disrespect for the Constitution.
- His disregard and disrespect for the American people.
- His blatant sexism, racism, and xenophobia.
- His stupidity.
- His refusal to deal with COVID-19 as a national emergency.
- His self-righteousness.
- His belief that he is intelligent.
- His lack of allegiance to anything but himself.
- His continually empty words.
- His lack of empathy.
- His sociopathic Narcissism.
- His apathy toward COVID-19 victims.
- His non-response to the deaths of genuinely great Americans (John Lewis, most recently).
- His foolishness.
- He is seeking to profit from a major government building contract in violation of the Constitution's emoluments clauses.
- His lack of concern for the legislative and democratic processes.
- His refusal to cooperate with Congress.
- His lack of knowledge of American history.
- His hatefulness.
- His untruthfulness and untrustworthiness.
- His infantile behavior.
- He has openly stated he lusts for his daughter Ivanka (called her a "piece of ass" in a Howard Stern interview).
- His mental instability.
- His refusal to deal forcefully with potential adversaries.
- His belief in his own infallibility
- His need to insult everybody, all the time.
- His ridiculous Tweets.
- His withdrawal of the U.S. from WHO.
- The Wall.
- His pulling out of the Paris Agreement.
- His inability to control his emotions.
- His ignorance.
- His rudeness, crudeness, and general lack of class.
- His overwhelming lack of leadership and any presidential quality whatsoever.
That's all for now.
--- Diogenes, 8/2/2020
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)