U.S. Constitution

U.S. Constitution
The foundation of the United States of America

19 December 2020

Advisor of Death

We're trying to lie back and relax this week before Christmas, but there's just so much idiocy and evil continuing to flow out of the Trump administration it's impossible to ignore. 

So, by way of a compromise, we'll be posting links to information that needs to be widely known.

The link below goes to a just-released memo from the chairman of the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis. It details some alarming suggestions about how to deal with the virus, such as infecting as many low-risk people as possible to initiate herd immunity. There is also a glimpse into to the crass cynicism of the administration, with HHS Senior Advisor Paul Alexander repeating the phrase "who cares?" regarding the public health impact.

These people should be arrested now, before they can disappear. 

https://coronavirus.house.gov/news/press-releases/chairman-clyburn-releases-memo-new-evidence-political-interference-pandemic

--- Diogenes, 12/19/2020

12 December 2020

The Trump Cult: Treason and Sedition

We are in the midst of a coup attempt. 

Over the course of his presidency lame-duck Trump has been steadily building a cult of personality, a classic and proven way to overthrow government.

Wikipedia has an excellent article on the nature and history of such cults, which I recommend to you. Here is its opening sentence:

"A cult of personality, or cult of the leader, arises when a country's regime – or, more rarely, an individual – uses the techniques of mass media, propaganda, the big lie, spectacle, the arts, patriotism, and government-organized demonstrations and rallies to create an idealized, heroic, and worshipful image of a leader, often through unquestioning flattery and praise."¹

If that sounds familiar it's because we've been watching that exact thing unfold over the past four years. Trump's platform of racism, bigotry, paranoia, and xenophobia appealed to the darker instincts of a shockingly large number of Americans. Although he lost the popular race by some 3 million votes, he accrued sufficient electoral votes to win the presidency.

He offered no coherent plans or policies. His "America First" doctrine, repeated ad nauseam, was a litany of the wrongs suffered by America at the hands of international cartels, i.e. treaty organizations and such, and of the injuries done to loyal Americans by foreigners, immigrants, and nonwhite races.

"America First" is code for "whites only."

The only foreign policy the Xenophobe-in-Charge pursued was to remove the United States from as many international treaty and aid organizations as possible and to isolate us from the rest of the world.

His wish to be an autocrat became clear when he made at least two attempts to have the Supreme Court remove Congressional oversight of the Executive Branch. When those attempts failed he attempted to assert control over the Supreme Court by stuffing it with a conservative super majority.

He has attempted to use the armed forces as his personal security force to put down civil unrest and has praised vigilantes as heroes.

When the COVID-19 pandemic began he paid little attention to it, its rapid spread, or the alarming numbers of victims who were falling ill and dying. Throughout 2020 his focus was on one thing and one thing only: his re-election bid.

In the midst of the pandemic, seeking to silence true information about COVID-19, he gutted the CDC.

Because the pandemic was likely to persuade a lot of people to vote by mail, he attempted to dismantle the Postal Service.

With the election over he and his apparatchiks have inappropriately and unsuccessfully flooded courts at all levels with requests to overturn the election. His attempts to subvert the electoral process, one of the cornerstones of our government, clearly amounts to sedition, if not treason.

Donald Trump has created a cult of personality: the first step in creating an autocratic regime. He has incited his followers to intimidate voters, disrupt the electoral process, and threaten voting officials who were simply doing their jobs. He and his followers are consciously and systematically attempting to subvert the will of the American people by trying to reverse the presidential election results.

If you're still not convinced that this is a cult, consider this: The Arizona State Republican Party in a recent series of tweets essentially asked its members if they were willing to die in the effort to overthrow the vote.²

The list of personality cults that have grown into tyrannical autocracies is long. In the modern world it includes Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Idi Amin, Mao Zedong, and Kim Jong-un. Will Trump be added to that list?

No cult of personality has yet confronted the Constitution of the United States. Trump has mounted a number of attacks on the Constitution, to no avail. He has attempted to suborn the Supreme Court, the chief guardian of the Constitution, with no success. 

People like Trump are the reason that all federal elected officials except the president swear to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic." Trump is a domestic enemy of the Constitution, even though he also swore an oath to preserve, protect, and defend it.

For now the Supreme Court is the last governmental bastion between democracy and the lying, seditious, hypocritical, treasonous creep that is the president. 

There are ways to remove him from office, and even now someone should do it. He and his rabid followers can do a lot of damage in the next 39 days.

La lutte continue!

--- Diogenes, 12/12/2020

 

¹ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_personality

² The Arizona Republic, https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/12/08/arizona-republican-party-asks-if-followers-die-election-president-donald-trump/6488952002/

11 December 2020

Immunity, Shmimunity

This started out as a brief statement that became something else. So I'm going to state the gist of it and let it go.

The president is not immune from criminal prosecution, either constitutionally or legally. Immunity is a fiction that Congress and the Executive Branch have been living behind since the Nixon years. The truth is that any prosecutor with a case and jurisdiction could indict the president now. Right now. And someone damn well should.

I urge you to contact your state's attorney general and suggest she take action while we still have a country. A lot of damage can be done in 41 days.

If you disagree with me about this let me know and I'll cite the details.

--- Diogenes, 12/11/2020


05 December 2020

Concerning Sedition

On his Youtube show of December 1, David Pakman made the excellent point that Lame Duck Trump, grasping at the smallest imaginable straws in an insane attempt to overturn the presidential election, repeatedly commits sedition.

Because that's not a word most of us use frequently, here's the Merriam-Webster definition: "incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority." Yes, that sounds like what Trump does when he tries to rally his army of gun-totin' knuckle draggers. So why hasn't he been called out on it?

Because, dear readers, except for a few months at the end of WWI, we haven't had a law against sedition since 1801. That law was the first real test of the First Amendment right to free speech, and the amendment won. The Sedition Act of 1798 was on the books only about three years.

Laws against sedition are fairly common around the world. They are most commonly found in less-than-democratic nations as you might expect, but they also show up in otherwise freedom-loving European monarchies, where badmouthing the royal family is a crime.

Here in the good old U.S. of A. we fiercely defend our right to speak freely, and defend even the right to say things we abhor. As Voltaire allegedly said, “I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” Few of us who are not military would readily contemplate that kind of sacrifice. But there are some things being said by the Litigant-in-Chief that seem to many of us to to require a strong response.

Can we do anything about it? Well, maybe. Tucked away in Title 18 of the U. S. Code is 18 USC § 2385, which provides penalties including up to 20 years in prison for advocating overthrow of the government. Here is part of it: 

"Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, . . . Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction."¹

This is a de facto sedition act. I think there is evidence that Trump has, by attempting to subvert this country's electoral process, by attempting to dismantle the postal service, by attempting to end Congress' oversight of the Executive Branch, and by inciting violence against state governments, has violated the act.

At this point I doubt anyone with the power would charge him, although his threat to withdraw funding from the military is surely a grave threat to national security. He may be found immune to the charge now, but maybe the FBI will add it to the list of his offenses and swoop in to gather him up after the Biden inauguration.

I can dream, can't I?

--- Diogenes, 12/5/2020


¹ Legal Information Institute, Cornell University: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2385

01 December 2020

National Review Sees The Light

When we relaunched Vox Populi last winter I commented that we were not a breaking news outlet, but a small voice in a big wilderness speaking out against Trump and his administration.

Still, I've consistently seen major news outlets say the same things I've been saying, although with a bit more restraint. Not that they heard it from me; I'm not prone to hubris. But it's nice to have one's voice reinforced.

Latest to join the chorus denouncing Trump has been the National Review. This is, as far as I know, unprecedented. The journal was founded by arch-conservative William F. Buckley, and it has been the source of many a Republican wet dream. 

Having temporarily slipped into the Trump cesspool a while back, the editors have recovered sufficiently to actually speak the truth. The article says in part, "make no mistake: The chief driver of the post-election contention of the past several weeks is the petulant refusal of one man to accept the verdict of the American people. The Trump team (and much of the GOP) is working backwards, desperately trying to find something, anything to support the president’s aggrieved feelings, rather than objectively considering the evidence and reacting as warranted."¹

Wow! You have to understand that this biweekly journal is probably the most ultra-conservative publication in English. It no longer has the erudition and intellectual potency of Buckley at the helm, but it is probably the most important source of conservative opinion for right-wingers who don't get all their news from Facebook or Twitter.

Well done, NR editors. Welcome to the real world.

--- Diogenes, 12/1/2020

¹ https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/11/trump-election-fraud-disgraceful-endgame/?utm_source=recirc-desktop&utm_medium=homepage&utm_campaign=river&utm_content=featured-content-trending&utm_term=first