Finding Reality In Fiction

". . . the bellwether of a crumbling democracy is always a violation of human rights. Look at Nazi Germany. North Korea. Ghana under Kwame Nkrumah. Iraq under Saddam Hussein , , ,"

That insightful statement was spoken neither in Congress nor in a campaign address. It is a line from the CBS political drama "Madam Secretary." 

From its premiere in 2014 the show took on big contemporary issues, and in early 2018 it began dealing with unpresident Trump. The Great Pretender is never mentioned by name, but issues stemming from his policies, his tyrannical views, and his actions have appeared in several episodes. 

To note just a few: the president becomes unhinged, declares himself the most powerful man in the world, and threatens an attack against Russia; he is only stopped when the Cabinet invokes Article 25 of the Constitution, relieving him of duty; a narcissistic Arizona governor declares his state to be exempt from federal law, talks about building a border wall, and begins rounding up and deporting Mexican nationals, separating children from their families; and an episode denouncing nationalism features Madeleine Albright, Hillary Clinton and Colin Powell in cameo roles.

Watching these issues unfold in a dramatic setting away from the hateful personage of Trump is instructive. When the emotional veil is lifted it becomes possible to evaluate the event objectively and get a good sense of how it would play out in the real world. This is helpful because it provides an opportunity to compare the fiction to reality and determine if our judgment on it was deserved, or if we were just having a knee-jerk reaction to Trump.
 
If "Madam Secretary" is unique it is because the producers and writers always get the laws right. Watching a season can provide great insight into the Constitution and its power.

Politics and the arts have interacted for centuries, but it was only with the advent of mass entertainment--cinema and television--that an effective message could be delivered to large audiences.     

One other example occurred in May of 1992 when a Republican vice-president from Indiana seeking re-election gave a speech about family values. In that speech he criticized a TV character for choosing to be an unwed mother. The veep was Dan Quayle. The character was Murphy Brown, played by Candice Bergen in the eponymous comedy.

In a response that made the front page of the New York Times, Bergen fired back, ridiculing Quayle for using a fictional character to make a policy point and defending single mothers. The feud carried on for only a very few episodes, but the story was picked up by late-night comedians, Quayle became the butt of many jokes, and George H. W. Bush was denied a second term.

I'm sure there are other shows being aired that also attack Trump indirectly. Please add a comment if you know of one.


--- Diogenes, 6/15/2020